Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arthur L Funk & Joan a Funk Charita Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$199kHuman Services$40kAnimals$22kEducation$18kFood & Nutrition$15kRecreation & Sports$3kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$449k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RADY CHIDRENS HOSPITAL FND$15,000
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$8,000
VISTA HILL FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$5,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%RADY CHIDRENS HOSPITAL FND: $23k → 11%UCLA JOHNSON CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%RADY CHIDRENS HOSPITAL FND: $15k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%RADY CHIDREN'S HOSPITAL FND: $13k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%VISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $11k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%RADY CHIDREN'S HOSPITAL FND: $11k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%RADY CHIDRENS HOSPITAL FND: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%RADY CHIDREN'S HOSPITAL FND: $10k → 11%VISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%RADY CHIDREN'S HOSPITAL FND: $10k → 11%VISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%VISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%ARK ANTIUES ANIMAL CHARITY: $5k → 11%VISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE BISHOPS SCHOOLS: $2k → 11%HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $2k → 11%HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $2k → 11%HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER: $1k → 11%FEEDING SAN DIEGO: $8k → 11%FEEDING SAN DIEGO: $4k → 11%FEEDING SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 11%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 11%SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UCSD BIRCH: $5k → 11%BIRCH AQUARIUM: $3k → 11%SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY CONS: $3k → 11%SAN DIEGUITO RIVER VALLEY CONSERV: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$279k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$279k
$18k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SCRIPPS HEALTH
    5× · 2019–2023 · $75k · revenue +46%
  • VH
    VISTA HILL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +12%
  • SG
    ST GERMAINE CHILDREN'S CHARITY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UCLA JOHNSON CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AA
    ARK ANTIUES ANIMAL CHARITY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • BA
    BIRCH AQUARIUM
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
4
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
8
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
9
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
10
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
11
San Antonio Regional Hospital

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of the people we serve.

Health
12
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

To restore, sustain and enhance the health and developmental potential of children through excellence in care, education, research and advocacy.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Las Patronas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RADY CHIDRENS HOSPITAL FND — $91,315 · OtherRADY CHIDRENS HOSPITAL FNDLAS PATRONAS — $15,500 · OtherLAS PATRONASUCLA JOHNSON CANCER CENTER — $5,000 · OtherARK ANTIUES ANIMAL CHARITY — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+4 more — $8,477 · Other+4 moreSCRIPPS HEALTH — $75,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTHVISTA HILL FOUNDATION — $28,000 · HealthVISTA HILL FOUNDATIONST GERMAINE CHILDREN'S CHARITY — $24,500 · Crime & LegalST GERMAI…University of Arizona Foundation — $16,000 · EducationFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $15,000 · Food & NutritionSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $9,000 · AnimalsHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $4,500 · Animals
Other$130,292Health$103,000Crime & Legal$24,500Education$16,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Animals$13,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA HILL FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST GERMAINE CHILDREN'S CHARITY — $24,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLAS PATRONAS — $15,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH
  • Who funds VISTA HILL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST GERMAINE CHILDREN'S CHARITY
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds LAS PATRONAS
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
  • Who funds HELEN WOODWARD ANIMAL CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arthur L Funk & Joan a Funk Charita Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph