· Public charity
Art With Impact
Promote mental wellness by creating space for young people to learn and connect through art and media.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ART WITH IMPACT CANADA | $80,302 |
Where the grant dollars land
Across the US and around the world.
US giving: 0% of grant dollars ($0). The 100% that went abroad ($102k) is mapped below.
Beyond the US: 100% of all-years giving ($102k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
Grants abroad, by region: $121k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, $91k to organizations and $30k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT · GRANT
How this is measured
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2023 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 1 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Art With Impact?
Find your warmest path to Art With Impact through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Art With Impact’s filings →