Skip to content

· Private foundation

Art Matters Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$297k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.7MReligion$15kHealth$10kInternational$8kPublic Benefit$8kPhilanthropy$8kEnvironment$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $241k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$24,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
OPEN COLLECTIVE FOUNDATION$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AUTISTIC WOMEN NONBINARY NETWORK: $5k → 13%MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $8k → 10%DANCERS' GROUP: $5k → 10%SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL: $5k → 14%LOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL: $7k → 17%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $10k → 20%THE ROCCA FAMILY - DIALA KHASAWNIH: $5k → 14%ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS: $8k → 21%INDIGENOUS SHOWCASE: $5k → 9%LIFE 4 ALL INC: $5k → 14%OPEN COLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%LOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL: $7k → 17%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $8k → 20%CRENSHAW DAIRY MART CONFIRMATION: $5k → 14%LOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL: $7k → 17%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $8k → 20%VISUAL AIDS: $3k → 17%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $8k → 20%RECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 20 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
192

Total granted

$304k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+34%

Still filing today

10%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $240k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RECESS ACTIVITIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue -32%
  • LM
    LOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $21k · revenue +4%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2024 · $16k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Alliance for Media Arts Culture Inc

To facilitate collaboration, innovation, strategic growth and cultural impact for the media arts field. We are a network of networks; we embolden creative media organization and artists and connect them with the world.

Arts & Culture
2
Artis Contemporary Israeli Art Fundinc

Artis is an independent nonprofit organization that supports contemporary artists from israel whose work addresses aesthetic, social and political questions to inspire reflection and debate. www.artis.art

Arts & Culture
3
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Artist Communities Alliance

Believing the cultivation of new art and ideas is essential to human progress, our mission is to advocate for and support artists' communities, in order to advance the endeavors of artists.

Community Improvement
5
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
6
Via Art Fund Inc

Via art fund is a nonprofit organization where art patrons join forces as partners in a new model of philanthropy to support visionary initiatives in art.

Arts & Culture
7
Asian American Arts Alliance Inc

Dedicated to ensuring greater representation, equity and opportunities for asian american artists and cultural organizations through resource sharing, promotion and community building. the alliance builds and supports their community…

Arts & Culture
8
(402) Arts Collective

Cultivating a vibrant network of artists who create community and impact culture.

Arts & Culture
9
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
10
The Bronx Council On the Arts Incorporated

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture
11
United Artist Collaborative
Arts & Culture
12
White Columns Inc

White columns identifies significant emerging and under-represented visual artists and encourages their creative and professional development through the presentation of group and solo exhibitions, an online curated artists registry, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bernie Sis and Coleen Beck Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+192 more: $1,534,800 · Other+192 moreRECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureLOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyBERNIE SIS AND COLEEN BECK FOUNDATION: $7,500 · PhilanthropyMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $8,000 · InternationalAUTISTIC WOMEN AND NONBINARY NETWORK: $5,000 · HealthSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$1,534,800Arts & Culture$68,500Philanthropy$15,500International$8,000Health$5,000Environment$5,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRECESS ACTIVITIES INC: $40,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetLOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISTIC WOMEN AND NONBINARY NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE 4 ALL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RECESS ACTIVITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds LOWER MANHATTAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds OPENCOLLECTIVE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Andrew W Mellon FoundationNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Art Matters Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Art Matters Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Art Matters Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Art Matters Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 239 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Art Matters’ filings →

    More from the funding graph