Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Armellino Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$118k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$75k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Armellino Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Armellino Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $118k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
21
4
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Education$2.4MHealth$40kRecreation & Sports$7kPublic Benefit$7kArts & Culture$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$1kCrime & Legal$210
02FY2021 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k12 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEDDIE FUND$75,000
SOUTHERN OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER$15,499
BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE$7,787
AUSTIN ANGELS$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
CATO INSTITUTE$2,500
MANHATTAN INSTITUTE$2,500
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS$1,000
LATHAM CENTERS$1,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
PMC JIMMY FUND$300
PARALYZED VETS OF AMERICA$250
NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL$210
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PMC JIMMY FUND: $300 → 7%LATHAM CENTERS: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2.1M → 22%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $2k → 17%AUSTIN ANGELS: $5k → 10%CATO INSTITUTE: $3k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITALS: $1k → 12%ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $1k → 17%ARONSON CELLO FESTIVAL: $3k → 17%BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE: $8k → 7%HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH: $5k → 8%PEDDIE FUND: $225k → 11%NEW JERSEY ANGELS: $2k → 11%TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $1k → 17%NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL: $210 → 14%HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH: $5k → 8%PEDDIE FUND: $75k → 11%SOUTHERN OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 11%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $1k → 17%PARALYZED VETS OF AMERICA: $250 → 14%THE HUNGER FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%MANHATTAN INSTITUTE: $3k → 17%MANHATTAN INSTITUTE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$324k · 5 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$324k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Peddie School
    2× · 2021–2023 · $300k · revenue +32%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +112%
  • MI
    MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOUTHERN OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • BV
    BERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +67%
  • AA
    AUSTIN ANGELS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

7
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Aronson Cello Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,118,600 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAThe Peddie School — $300,000 · EducationThe Peddie School+1 more — $5,500 · EducationSOUTHERN OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER — $15,499 · OtherHACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH — $10,000 · OtherAUSTIN ANGELS — $5,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING — $4,500 · OtherTHE HUNGER FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherNEW JERSEY ANGELS — $1,500 · Other+6 more — $3,760 · OtherBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC — $7,787 · HealthMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $4,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE — $2,500 · Public BenefitTHE ARONSON CELLO FESTIVAL — $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,424,100Other$41,759Health$7,787Public Benefit$6,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $2,118,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Peddie School — $300,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBERGEN VOLUNTEER MEDICAL INITIATIVE INC — $7,787 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARONSON CELLO FESTIVAL — $2,500 over 1y, 50% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLATHAM CENTERS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $210 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Armellino Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 39%
  • Latham Centers Inc39% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Armellino Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Armellino Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph