Skip to content

· Public charity

Armed Forces Families Foundation Inc

The armed forces families foundation was founded with the intent to provide and care for those who care for our freedom.

$599k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$475k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.1MArts & Culture$461kRecreation & Sports$316kHealth$263kHousing & Shelter$227kYouth Development$72kEducation$56kScience & Tech$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $124k
  • $250k+1 grant · $475k
$474,607
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USO INC$474,607
CITY OF GULFPORT$124,168
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOGS INC: $115k → 10%JOSEPH & SARAH CARING FOR VETS INC: $7k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 6 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
27

Total granted

$2.0M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+16%

Still filing today

33%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
Public BenefitHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $210k
  • GJ
    GREATER JACKSONVILLE AREA USO COUNCIL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $118k · revenue -59%

Funded once

  • US
    UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $171k · revenue +219%
  • UM
    USFSP MILITARY & VETERANS SUCCESS CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $120k
  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $115k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Cause to Give Us Paws

Service Dog training for Disabled Veterans

Animals
2
United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services
3
A Soldier's Journey Home

The mission is to build homes for soldiers injured during the line of duty.

Human Services
4
Warfighter Scuba

To provide scuba instruction for veterans with ptsd. the weightlessness of scuba provides a peaceful respite from the pressures and trauma of military service. scuba for amputees provides a freedom of movement not experienced for years…

Public Benefit
5
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
6
The National World War Ii Museum Inc

The national wwii museum tells the story of the american experience in the war that changed the world-why it was fought, how it was won, and what it means today-so that all generations will understand the price of freedom and be inspired…

Arts & Culture
7
Soldiers of America
Human Services
8
Homes for Heroes Foundation
Housing & Shelter
9
Homes Fit for Heroes Inc
Health
10
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
11
Kingswood Ranch

To be a haven for our Military and First Responders to come and unwind. Come alone, or with your family. The importance of our facility is to combat that 22 a day we lose to veteran suicide, and the dwindling workforce of our Doctors,…

Health
12
Cape Verdean Veterans Memorial Project
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Five Star Veterans Center; the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warriors Abilities Ranch Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,490,998 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INCWOUNDED WARRIORS ABILITIES RANCH CO: $111,794 · Public BenefitWOUNDED WARRIORS ABILITIES RANCH COIndividual grant recipient: $210,213 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $170,775 · OtherUDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INCCITY OF GULFPORT: $124,168 · OtherCITY OF GULFPORTUSFSP MILITARY & VETERANS SUCCESS CENTER: $120,034 · OtherUSFSP MILITARY & VETERANS SUCCESS CENTERGREATER JACKSONVILLE AREA USO COUNCIL INC: $117,613 · OtherGREATER JACKSONVILLE AREA USO COUNCIL INCFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATIONBAY PINES VA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM: $93,930 · OtherBAY PINES VA HEALTHCARE SYSTEMUS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS: $89,953 · OtherUS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSCHARLES GEORGE VA MEDICAL CENTER: $60,000 · OtherFREEDOM PARK SCHOOL: $56,213 · Other+16 more: $453,818 · Other+16 moreSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $115,030 · Human ServicesJOSEPH AND SARAH CARING FOR VETS INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesLIBERTY MANOR FOR VETERANS INC: $69,049 · Housing & ShelterFIVE STAR VETERANS CENTER: $51,846 · Housing & ShelterST PETERSBURG WAREHOUSE ARTS DISTRICT INC: $49,500 · Arts & CultureBOLEY CENTERS INC: $20,950 · Health
Public Benefit$1,602,792Other$1,596,717Human Services$121,530Housing & Shelter$120,895Arts & Culture$49,500Health$20,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,490,998 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER JACKSONVILLE AREA USO COUNCIL INC: $117,613 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $115,030 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS ABILITIES RANCH CO: $111,794 over 2y, 24% of budgetLIBERTY MANOR FOR VETERANS INC: $69,049 over 1y, 27% of budgetFIVE STAR VETERANS CENTER: $51,846 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetST PETERSBURG WAREHOUSE ARTS DISTRICT INC: $49,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTrue Blue Navy Families Benefactors Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetBOLEY CENTERS INC: $20,950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUSO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $16,801 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UDT - SEAL MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER JACKSONVILLE AREA USO COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS ABILITIES RANCH CO ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY MANOR FOR VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIVE STAR VETERANS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST PETERSBURG WAREHOUSE ARTS DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds True Blue Navy Families Benefactors Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOLEY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds USO OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH AND SARAH CARING FOR VETS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Armed Forces Families Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Armed Forces Families Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Boley Centers Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Five Star Veterans Center: 17% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Armed Forces Families Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Armed Forces Families Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Armed Forces Families’ filings →

More from the funding graph