Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Arizona Grantmakers Forum

To encourage, assist, promote private philanthropy to increase the awareness, appreciation, effectiveness of private philanthropy by providing information, networking opportunities, technical assistance, related services to private foundations, trusts, corporations, endowed community foundations, government, individuals.

$829k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$818k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192022.

Community Improvement$818kPhilanthropy$300kCivil Rights$189kInternational$5k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$817,536
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alliance of Arizona Nonprofits$817,536
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Arizona Community Foundation: $100k → 11%Alliance for Global Justice: $38k → 15%Arizona Community Foundation: $100k → 11%Arizona Community Foundation: $100k → 11%International Rescue Committee: $5k → 11%Black Lives Matter Phoenix Metro: $38k → 11%Black Phoenix Organizing Collective: $38k → 11%Poder in Action Inc: $38k → 11%Alliance of Arizona Nonprofits: $818k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
3
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
4
Black Phoenix Votes

Black Phoenix Votes is a year-round political and electoral program grounded in Black liberation, strategic organizing, and bold governance, with a focused presence in Maricopa County. As a project of Black Political Cultivation AZ BPCAZ…

Civil Rights
5
Poder

We strengthen the voice and leadership of our communities to drive meaningful change. Through collective action, we work to break down barriers, improve quality of life, and create a future where our people can thrive with dignity,…

Civil Rights
6
Alliance to Mobilize Our Resistance

AMOR is an alliance of community based grassroots organizations mobilizing at the intersections of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and immigration status to prevent, to respond to, and to end state violence against our community.

Human Services
7
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
8
Arizona Justice for Our Neighbors

AZJFON provides legal services to low-income immigrants

Crime & Legal
9
The State of Black Arizona

The State of Black Arizona leads the production, synthesis, and socialization of actionable data and insights for all Arizonans, focusing on the Black community. We ensure that the factors leading to inequitable outcomes are identified,…

Human Services
10
Arizona Capital Representation Project

ACRP is a non-profit legal services organization that assists indigent persons facing the death penalty and sentenced to death in Arizona through direct representation, pro-bono consulting services and training for capital defense…

11
Instituto Power

Instituto's mission is to build sustained political power of low-income and communities of color in Arizona.

Public Benefit
12
Black Alliance for Just Immigration

The organization provides public education on the issues related to fair and just immigration policies.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Global Justice Corp and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AZ IMPACT FOR GOOD — $817,536 · Community ImprovementAZ IMPACT FOR GOODARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDAT…Alliance for Global Justice Corp — $37,735 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 · InternationalBLACK LIVES MATTER PHOENIX METRO — $37,735 · Arts & CultureBlack Phoenix Organizing Collective — $37,735 · Food & NutritionBlack Mothers Forum Inc — $37,735 · Civil RightsPoder in Action — $37,735 · Public Benefit
Community Improvement$817,536Philanthropy$300,000International$42,735Arts & Culture$37,735Food & Nutrition$37,735Civil Rights$37,735Public Benefit$37,735

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAZ IMPACT FOR GOOD — $817,536 over 1y, 33% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $37,735 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLACK LIVES MATTER PHOENIX METRO — $37,735 over 1y, 13% of budgetBlack Phoenix Organizing Collective — $37,735 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetBlack Mothers Forum Inc — $37,735 over 1y, 31% of budgetPoder in Action — $37,735 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arizona Grantmakers Forum funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph