Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Area Agency on Aging of Palm Beach Treasure Coast Inc

The area agency on aging of palm beach/treasure coast is a private, non-profit, regional agency whose mission is to advocate, plan and promote the independence, dignity, health and well-being of seniors and their caregivers in a manner that embraces diversity and reflects the communities we serve established by the older americans act.…

$31M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF PALM BEACH TREASURE COAST INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $29,529,267 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $31,337,816 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,808,549 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $241k
  • $250k+9 grants · $29M
$2,308,997
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALM BEACH COUNTY DIVISION OF SENIOR SERVICES$8,610,327
MAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER$7,753,718
COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC$4,009,092
ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC$2,931,149
SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION$2,308,997
COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY$2,074,944
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$729,471
OKEECHOBEE SENIOR SERVICES$591,294
MORSELIFE$279,109
RUTH RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC$241,166
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $30.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2.3M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC: $4.0M → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $2.3M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC: $3.5M → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $1.8M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC: $2.9M → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $1.7M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC: $2.3M → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $1.5M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE COUNTY: $2.2M → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $1.4M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE COUNTY: $1.8M → 13%SENIOR RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $1.1M → 12%COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE COUNTY: $1.8M → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$162M · 13 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -99% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$162M
$395k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
-99%

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $39M · revenue +47% · 79% of their budget
  • AC
    ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $20M · revenue +5% · 44% of their budget
  • SR
    Senior Resource Association Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • PT
    PALM TRAN CONNECTION
    one grant, 2018 · $322k
  • FT
    FEDERATION TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $73k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dade County Senior Citizens Center
Human Services
2
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
3
Community Services Council of Brevard County Inc

In service to the aging citizens of brevard county, supporting independence, health, safety, and quality of life.

Human Services
4
Monarchcare Inc

Monarchcare is a social service agency providing direct client services, information, and resources for the care and support of the frail, elderly, disabled, or at-risk populations of south florida.

Human Services
5
Jewish Family Home Care Inc

Jewish family home care, inc. is dedicated to empowering individuals, strengthening older adults and families, and protecting the vulnerable by providing exceptional home care and nursing assessments services guided by jewish values,…

Health
6
Marion Senior Services Inc

To assist the elderly, disabled and disadvantaged residents of marion county to maintain independent living status.

7
La Familia Senior Community Center
8
North Miami Foundation for Senior Citizens Services Inc

The mission of the foundation is to maximize the opportunity for the elderly of ne miami dade county to maintain their personal independence & to enhance their quality of life by providing a broad array of services without charge

9
Centers for Aging and Rehabilitation of Florida Inc

Skilled nursing facility to provide medical, continuous nursing, health and social services to patients.

Health
10
Elder Care Community Council of Franklin County Fl Inc

To serve the senior citizens of franklin county florida by connecting seniors to a community of support through advocacy, enhancement and expansion of services and outreach to link people to services and items of need.

Human Services
11
Baker Senior Center Naples Inc

To provide confidence, connection and support to seniors living in collier and southern lee counties.

Human Services
12
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Resource Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Federation Transportation Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PALM BEACH COUNTY DIVISION OF SENIOR SERVICES — $50,969,646 · OtherPALM BEACH COUNTY DIVISION OF SENIOR SERVICESMAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC — $39,477,243 · OtherMAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INCTHE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC — $11,572,086 · OtherTHE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC+8 more — $9,193,481 · Other+8 moreCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC — $18,538,813 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING OF S…Senior Resource Association Inc — $12,157,704 · Human ServicesSenior Resource Assoc…ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC — $19,524,182 · HealthALZHEIMER'S CO…RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $1,129,748 · HealthRUTH & NORMAN …
Other$111,212,456Human Services$30,696,517Health$20,653,930

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC — $39,477,243 over 7y, 79% of budgetALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC — $19,524,182 over 7y, 44% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC — $18,538,813 over 7y, 91% of budgetSenior Resource Association Inc — $12,157,704 over 7y, 20% of budgetTHE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC — $11,572,086 over 7y, 34% of budgetLegal Aid Society of Palm Beach County Inc — $2,928,639 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetMORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,470,356 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $1,129,748 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetFLORIDA RURAL LEGAL SERVICES INC — $609,626 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFEDERATION TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC — $72,584 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAE VOLEN SENIOR CENTER INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF ST LUCIE INC
  • Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County Inc
  • Who funds MORSELIFE HEALTH SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds RUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FLORIDA RURAL LEGAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FEDERATION TRANSPORTATION SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

W and H Thomas Charitable TrustTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: W and H Thomas Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Area Agency on Aging of Palm Beach Treasure Coast Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County Inc10% of income from government
  • Florida Rural Legal Services Inc2% of income from government
  • Mae Volen Senior Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph