Skip to content
Ardleigh Impact Corp at a glance

· Public charity

Ardleigh Impact Corp

Promoting the common good and general welfare of the community through advocacy communications outreach and other activities related to advancing commonsense policy solutions that benefit all Americans.

$5.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+8 grants · $3.6M
$200,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Right Vote$1,100,000
Winning for Women Inc$450,000
With Honor Action Inc$450,000
New Heights for America Inc$400,000
Veterans on Duty Inc$350,000
RightCount Action Inc$345,000
Aurora Venture Inc$300,000
Americans 4 Security Inc$250,000
Center for Campaign Innovation$200,000
Governing Majority Education Fund$200,000
American Action Network$200,000
AR2 Inc$170,000
American Unity Fund$125,000
Common Sense Leadership Fund$125,000
National Black Empowerment Action Fund Inc$125,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Action Network: $200k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senate Opportunity Fund

Advance Conservative Solutions Through Research And Communication On Public Policy Issues.

—
2
Act for America

Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…

Civil Rights
3
Defend Democracy Now

Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.

—
4
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
5
Secure Democracy Usa

Secure Democracy USA is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that works to build stronger elections, state by state.

Civil Rights
6
Americans for Limited Government Inc

Advocate for various issues relating to limited government.

Civil Rights
7
Minnesota Action Network Inc

To create, encourage, and promote center right policies based on the principles of freedom, limited government, American exceptionalism, and strong policies in the state of MN, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which…

Public Benefit
8
American Exceptionalism Institute

The organization engaged in public communications and issue education activities related to national security, the protection of life, and tax and spending issues.

Community Improvement
9
Election Watch Inc

Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.

Civil Rights
10
Advancing American Freedom Inc

Advancing american freedom promotes and defends the successful policies of recent years that yielded unprecedented prosperity at home and restored america's strength abroad, while elevating traditional american values. aaf serves the…

International
11
Stand True America

The purpose of the organization is to advocate for the collective interests of American citizens and defend the nation against enemies and critics of the United States.

—
12
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rightcount Action Inc; the most unlike its peers is Republican Main Street Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
0/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WINNING FOR WOMEN INC: $450,000 · OtherWINNING FOR WOMEN INCNew Heights for America: $400,000 · OtherNew Heights for AmericaVETERANS ON DUTY INC: $350,000 · OtherVETERANS ON DUTY INCRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INC: $345,000 · OtherRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INCAurora Venture Inc: $300,000 · OtherAurora Venture IncAMERICANS 4 SECURITY INC: $250,000 · OtherAMERICANS 4 SECURITY INCGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $200,000 · OtherGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUNDCenter for Campaign Innovation: $200,000 · OtherCenter for Campaign InnovationAR2 INC: $170,000 · OtherAMERICAN UNITY FUND INC: $125,000 · OtherNational Black Empowerment Action Fund Inc: $125,000 · OtherCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INC: $125,000 · Other+4 more: $300,000 · Other+4 moreRight Vote Inc: $1,100,000 · Civil RightsRight Vote IncWITH HONOR ACTION INC: $450,000 · Civil RightsWITH HONOR ACTION INCAmerican Action Network Inc: $200,000 · Human ServicesREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $100,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN EDUCATION COALITION INC: $100,000 · Education
Other$3,340,000Civil Rights$1,550,000Human Services$200,000Public Benefit$100,000Education$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRight Vote Inc: $1,100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetWITH HONOR ACTION INC: $450,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetWINNING FOR WOMEN INC: $450,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNew Heights for America: $400,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetVETERANS ON DUTY INC: $350,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetRIGHTCOUNT ACTION INC: $345,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetAMERICANS 4 SECURITY INC: $250,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGOVERNING MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND: $200,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCenter for Campaign Innovation: $200,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetAmerican Action Network Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAR2 INC: $170,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetAMERICAN UNITY FUND INC: $125,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetNational Black Empowerment Action Fund Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMON SENSE LEADERSHIP FUND INC: $125,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTEACH ACTION FUND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSTATE ARMOR ACTION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetINVEST IN EDUCATION COALITION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN FREEDOM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCoalition for American Excellence: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Leon Rachel CorpAmerican Action Netwo…The Concord FundSumm Foundation
Leon Rachel CorpVA26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Leon Rachel Corp · American Action Network Inc · The Concord Fund · Summ Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ardleigh Impact Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ardleigh Impact Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ardleigh Impact Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Ardleigh Impact Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ardleigh Impact’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home