Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Architectural Woodwork Institute Education Foundation Inc

To identify, cultivate and deliver resources that provide opportunities for education and professional development in the architectural woodwork industry.

$269k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of Architectural Woodwork Institute Education Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $201,672 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $268,582 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $66,910 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$14,600
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pittsburg State University Foundation$50,107
Madison College$32,415
Fort Zumwalt School District$21,373
Lake Mills High School$18,930
Ignacio High School$14,995
Alhambra Unified School District$14,600
Reed-Custer High School$14,178
Aurora Public Schools$11,331
Prairie View USD 362$9,727
TECC-W$8,417
Stoughton Area School District$5,599
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Alhambra Unified School District: $15k → 14%TECC-W: $8k → 8%Prairie View USD 362: $10k → 13%Pittsburg State University Foundation: $50k → 18%Fort Zumwalt School District: $21k → 5%Lake Mills High School: $19k → 8%Madison College: $32k → 10%WOOD INDUSTRY RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 14%Aurora Public Schools: $11k → 10%Ignacio High School: $15k → 12%Shaker Heights Middle School: $15k → 17%Reed-Custer High School: $14k → 7%Pittsburg State University Foundation: $36k → 18%Fort Atkinson School District: $6k → 8%Stoughton Area School District: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
OH
CA
CO
MO
KS
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Madison Area Technical College — $32,415 · OtherMadison Area Technical CollegeLAKE MILLS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $18,930 · OtherLAKE MILLS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTIGNACIO SCHOOL DISTRICT — $14,995 · OtherIGNACIO SCHOOL DISTRICTALHAMBRA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $14,600 · OtherALHAMBRA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTShaker Heights Middle School — $14,572 · OtherShaker Heights Middle SchoolReed-Custer High School — $14,178 · OtherReed-Custer High SchoolAurora Public Schools Foundation — $11,331 · OtherAurora Public Schools FoundationWIRC (payable to Industrial Strength Marketing) — $10,000 · OtherWIRC (payable to Industrial Strength Marketing)Prairie View USD 362 — $9,727 · OtherPrairie View USD 362Fort Atkinson School District — $6,162 · OtherStoughton Area School District — $5,599 · OtherPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $86,535 · EducationPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCFort Zumwalt Public School Education Foundation — $21,373 · EducationFort Zumwalt Public School Education FoundationLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $8,417 · EducationLewisville Education Foundation Inc
Other$152,509Education$116,325

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $86,535 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFort Zumwalt Public School Education Foundation — $21,373 over 1y, 27% of budgetAurora Public Schools Foundation — $11,331 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $8,417 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Fort Zumwalt Public School Education Foundation
  • Who funds Aurora Public Schools Foundation
  • Who funds Lewisville Education Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Architectural Woodwork Institute Education Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Architectural Woodwork Institute Education Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Architectural Woodwork Institute Education Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph