· Private foundation
Aquidneck Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $210k
Anchored by a single position — about 98% of reported assets are held in William Sonoma.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ACLU | $210,000 |
| HARVARD UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| VINFEN GATEWAY ARTS | $15,000 |
| DANA-FARBER - PMC | $10,000 |
| PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE | $6,000 |
| BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY | $5,000 |
| SHARE OUR STRENGTH | $5,000 |
| TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES | $5,000 |
| BROOKLYN MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| GAINGER COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING | $1,500 |
| BERKSHIRE HUMANE SOCIETY | $980 |
| RHODE ISLAND JEWISH HISTORICAL ASSOC | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $253k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL6× · 2019–2025 · $92k · revenue +36%
- PPPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC7× · 2018–2025 · $65k · revenue +186%
- TATRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC7× · 2019–2025 · $59k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- BIBETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue +117%
- CACONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL TEMPLE ISRAELone grant, 2020 · $10k
EAST BOSTON SOCIAL CENTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +121%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…
Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…
Bb&n, an all gender day school in cambridge, massachusetts, was established in 1974 by the merger of two independent schools, the buckingham school and the browne & nichols school, founded respectively in 1889 and 1883. located on multiple…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Reservations and the most unlike its peers is Westford Rotary Charitable Endowment Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL LAHEY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds THE BERKELEY CARROLL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds PAWSITIVE PANTRY ↗
- Who funds TOURO SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BOSTON SOCIAL CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds STEPS TO SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF REICHMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WORLD WAR II INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FIRST PARENTING PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE SECOND STEP INC ↗
- Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WORLD BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND LAND TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Claudia K Perles Family Foundation Inc · The Greater Barrington Foundation Inc Dba the Barrington Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aquidneck Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- 18 Degrees Inc — 60% of income from government
- East Boston Social Centers Inc — 50% of income from government
- Judge Baker Children's Center — 29% of income from government
- The Second Step Inc — 26% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Families First Parenting Program Inc — 10% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Steps to Success Inc — 5% of income from government
- Community Rowing Inc — 2% of income from government
- Community Access to the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Hancock Shaker Village Inc — 1% of income from government
- Shakespeare & Company Inc — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.