Skip to content

· Public charity

Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inc

The Appalachian Forest Heritage Area integrates central Appalachian forest history, culture, natural history, products, and forestry management into a heritage tourism initiative to promote rural community development.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$132kRecreation & Sports$24kEducation$7kEnvironment$7kCommunity Improvement$6kYouth Development$5k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $101,466, the rows itemized in this filing. The $121,522 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,056 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $54k
$9,494
Median grant
2
States reached
$577k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Evergreen Heritage Center Foundation Inc$13,500
Passages of the W Potomac Heritage Area$10,000
Hardy County Convention and Visitors Bureau$10,000
Woodlands Development Group$10,000
High Rocks Educational Corporation$10,000
Arthurdale Heritage Inc$9,494
Future Generations Univ Corp$8,388
Friends of Blackwater$6,788
Greenbrier Valley Archaeology Inc$6,000
Randolph Co Park and Rec dba Camp Pioneer$6,000
Woodlands Community Lenders$5,875
Experience Learning Inc$5,421
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Mountain Heritage Trails Inc: $10k → 13%Arthurdale Heritage Inc: $9k → 14%Future Generations Univ Corp: $8k → 15%Friends of Blackwater: $7k → 16%Randolph County Parks and Rec: $10k → 17%Greenbrier Valley Archaeology: $10k → 18%High Rocks Educational Corporation: $10k → 20%Passages of the W Potomac Heritage Area: $10k → 18%Hardy County Convention and Visitors Bureau: $10k → 13%Arthurdale heritage Inc: $7k → 14%Future Generations University: $7k → 15%Randolph Co Park and Rec dba Camp Pioneer: $6k → 17%Greenbrier Valley Theater: $8k → 18%Allegany Museum Inc: $8k → 18%Experience Learning Inc: $5k → 15%Woodlands Development Group: $13k → 17%Greenbrier Valley Archaeology Inc: $6k → 18%Evergreen Heritage Center Foundation Inc: $14k → 18%Woodlands Development Group: $10k → 17%City of Frostburg: $8k → 18%Woodlands Community Lenders: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 42%.

Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 31% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 5 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$86k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-24%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EnvironmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WD
    Woodlands Development Group Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $23k · revenue -32%
  • AH
    ARTHURDALE HERITAGE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -25%
  • GV
    GREENBRIER VALLEY ARCHAEOLOGY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k

Funded once

  • MH
    MOUNTAIN HERITAGE TRAILS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CO
    City of Frostburg
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • AM
    ALLEGANY MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Red River Economic Development

Economic Development and Tourism Promotion in Eastern Kentucky

Community Improvement
2
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Inc

Promotes, encourages and works for the conservation and appreciation of the natural resources of West Virginia

—
3
Greenbrier Valley Restoration Project Inc

Gvrp, inc. is an entity focused on watershed protection and sustainable community development. gvrp is concentrating its initial efforts in two areas: public fundraising and development of a community center and charitable open space in…

Environment
4
Westmoreland County Museum & Library Inc

Preservation and promotion of the history, traditions, and culture of westmoreland county, virginia and preservation of historical records of the county.

—
5
West Virginia Land Stewardship Corporation

To promote sustainable economic development by facilitating reuse of commercial, industrial, and mining sites and providing long-term management of key risks from legacy environmental concerns.

Community Improvement
6
The Homeplace of Green River Inc

To protect and promote rural american culture, local history and sustainability of agriculture and natural resources through education, conservation and the economic opportunities of tourism.

Community Improvement
7
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
8
Eky Heritage Foundation Inc

Embracing our past, empowering our people, and unlocking our future by developing a tourism industry cluster, and revitalizing our communities in the coalfields of eastern kentucky

Community Improvement
9
Westmoreland Land Trust

To conserve and steward lands and waters of Westmoreland County that harbor ecological, cultural or recreational qualities to offer a healthier and more sustainable future for all.

Environment
10
Greenbank Mill Associates Inc

Our mission is dedicated to preserving the greenbank mill national historical district as a public museum and expanding public knowledge of red clay vally industrial, agricultural and social hstory through on site educational and…

Arts & Culture
11
Vermont Granite Museum of Barre

Located within an authentic turn-of-the-century granite manufacturing plant, the museums mission is to create stimulating, interactive environments for learning about the geology, technology, history, and art of vermonts unique granite…

Arts & Culture
12
Forest County Historical Society

The collection, preservation and interpretation of all materials pertaining to the history of Forest County, PA.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthurdale Heritage Inc; the most unlike its peers is Allegany Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTHURDALE HERITAGE INC: $16,338 · OtherARTHURDALE HERITAGE INCGREENBRIER VALLEY ARCHAEOLOGY INC: $16,000 · OtherGREENBRIER VALLEY ARCHAEOLOGY INCRANDOLPH COUNTY PARK & RECREATION BOARD 4-H CLUBS & AFFILIATED 4-H: $16,000 · OtherRANDOLPH COUNTY PARK & RECREATION BOARD 4-H CLUBS & …UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKMOUNTAIN HERITAGE TRAILS INC: $10,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN HERITAGE TRAILS INCCity of Frostburg: $8,125 · OtherCity of FrostburgALLEGANY MUSEUM INC: $7,925 · OtherALLEGANY MUSEUM INCWoodlands Development Group Inc: $22,500 · Housing & ShelterWoodlands Deve…EVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATIO: $13,500 · EnvironmentEVERGREEN HE…FRIENDS OF BLACKWATER INC: $6,788 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF B…Hardy Co Convention&Visitor Bureau: $10,000 · Community ImprovementHardy Co …Woodlands Community Lenders Inc: $5,875 · Community ImprovementWoodlands…FUTURE GENERATIONS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $15,188 · EducationFUTURE GE…THE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $10,000 · EmploymentGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $7,500 · Arts & CultureEXPERIENCE LEARNING INC: $5,421 · Recreation & Sports
Other$84,388Housing & Shelter$22,500Environment$20,288Community Improvement$15,875Education$15,188Employment$10,000Arts & Culture$7,500Recreation & Sports$5,421

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWoodlands Development Group Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARTHURDALE HERITAGE INC: $16,338 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFUTURE GENERATIONS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $15,188 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEVERGREEN HERITAGE CENTER FOUNDATIO: $13,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE HIGH ROCKS EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHardy Co Convention&Visitor Bureau: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetALLEGANY MUSEUM INC: $7,925 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGREENBRIER REPERTORY THEATRE COMPANY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF BLACKWATER INC: $6,788 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWoodlands Community Lenders Inc: $5,875 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEXPERIENCE LEARNING INC: $5,421 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Claude Worthington Benedum FoundationPA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Evergreen Heritage Center Foundatio: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inc?

Find your warmest path to Appalachian Forest Heritage Area Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Appalachian Forest Heritage Area’s filings →

More from the funding graph