Skip to content

· Public charity

Aofpacific Affordable Housing Corp

Promote quality affordable housing for moderate to low income households and the elderly throughout alaska, arizona, california, oregon, illinois, and washington state by the acquisition, rehabilitation, operation, and preservation of affordable multifamily housing.

$554k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$490k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$6.1MHuman Services$153kEducation$34kFood & Nutrition$20kYouth Development$20kHealth$10kEmployment$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $537,263, the rows itemized in this filing. The $553,686 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,423 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
  • $250k+1 grant · $490k
$11,278
Median grant
3
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC$490,000
LONG BEACH BLAST$20,000
WILLOW CROSSING LLLP$11,278
FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR CARE$10,000
THE POSTMAN INC$5,985
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT INC: $50k → 10%COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT INC: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 4 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$6.2M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.1M · revenue +88% · 65% of their budget
  • FC
    FRIENDLY CENTER INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $80k · revenue -13%
  • CE
    COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $65k · revenue -44% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • P
    PANZA
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • I
    INTERCONNECTION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -33%
  • CF
    CITY FABRICK
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Beach Nonprofit Partnership Inc Dba the Nonprofit Partnership

We believe in the power of nonprofits to impact and transform communities. To strengthen the sector and the communities it serves, The Nonprofit Partnership engages in learning, collaboration, resource sharing, and advocacy.

Community Improvement
2
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
3
Labor Community Strategy Center

The strategy center is a think tank/act tank for regional, national and international movement building, founded in 1988 and based in the 10 million-person world city of los angeles. our campaigns, projects, and publications are rooted in…

Health
4
Inclusive Communities Project

Promote fair and affordable housing for low income families, free from the vestiges of segregation and discrimination.

Housing & Shelter
5
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
6
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
7
Los Angeles Business Council Formerly Known As West La Chamber of Commerce

The los angeles business council, labc, serves the los angeles community by providing public education, awareness to community issues, advocacy of sustainable development, workforce housing and business development.

—
8
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
9
Just Communities Central Coast

At Just Communities we work to ensure that Central Coast schools, organizations, and communities are places of opportunity, not places of limitation. We advance justice by engaging our community in leadership development, dialogue, action…

Civil Rights
10
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
11
Community Credit Lab

To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.

Human Services
12
Opportunity Council

Opportunity Council (The Council) helps address immediate and crisis-related basic needs such as food, emergency shelter, and eviction prevention. The Council also helps develop self-sufficiency and resiliency within our community by…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friendly Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is City Fabrick. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,054,731 · OtherTHE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC+5 more: $114,863 · OtherCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today: $20,000 · EducationLONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationINTERCONNECTION: $10,000 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $6,180 · EducationFeeding The Soul Foundation: $20,000 · PhilanthropyPANZA: $14,500 · Housing & ShelterCITY FABRICK: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$6,169,594Human Services$65,000Education$54,180Philanthropy$20,000Housing & Shelter$14,500Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE AMERICAN OPPORTUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,054,731 over 8y, 65% of budgetFRIENDLY CENTER INC: $80,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT INC: $65,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetFeeding The Soul Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today: $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetLONG BEACH CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPANZA: $14,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINTERCONNECTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY FABRICK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP PREP CHARTER SCHOOL: $6,180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aofpacific Affordable Housing Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aofpacific Affordable Housing Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aofpacific Affordable Housing Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Aofpacific Affordable Housing Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aofpacific Affordable Housing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph