· Private foundation
Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GATHER | $52,250 |
| COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC | $25,000 |
| CROSS ROADS HOUSE INC | $20,000 |
| THE FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER OF PORTSMOUTH DBA JOAN G LOVERING HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| GOODWORK | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC | $2,500 |
| HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GGather4× · 2022–2025 · $75k · revenue +102%
- CRCross Roads House Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +31%
- SSSEE SCIENCE CENTER INC2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- SSSEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -44%
- FIFor Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technologyone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +16%
- TFTHE FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGESone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New hampshire women's foundation invests in opportunity and equality for women and girls in new hampshire through research, advocacy, education and grant making.
To strengthen new hampshire's economy and conserve natural resources by promoting a transition to clean, efficient, and renewable energy.
We achieve our purpose by: supporting New Hampshire's nonprofit organizations and students; connecting generous people with pressing community needs and effective ways to give; collaborating, building relationships and learning from all of…
Develop, nurture and maintain an informed, engaged, and civil new hampshire citizenry.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
To create a safe space for youth to explore topics of gender and sexuality in a welcoming and understanding environment.
The Children's Scholarship Fund (CSF) empowers families by providing children in need with scholarships, and by supporting expanded educational opportunities for all children.
Operations of state wide interscholastic activities involving member schools and their students
New hampshire fiscal policy institute promotes opportunity and economic well-being for all new hampshire residents by producing and disseminating independent research and analysis to inform public policy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spaulding Academy & Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Fuller Foundation of New Hampshire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds Gather ↗
- Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
- Who funds SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds SEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) ↗
- Who funds GOODWORK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COLLEGES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT PARK ARTS FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOREVER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
- Who funds FULLER FOUNDATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Foundation for Seacoast Health · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Schleyer Foundation · Gateway Fund 7522-Xxxxxx00049 · Exeter Hospital Inc · A Caring Community Inc · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Macdonald Family Foundation · Bartko Family Charitable Foundation · Rosamond Thaxter Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.