Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anne Hunting Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$54kArts & Culture$6kAnimals$2kHuman Services$1kFood & Nutrition$450Health$280Education$250Environment$200Other$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $104
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$54,069
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$54,069
WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER$104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 8%FOREST PARK PRESERVATION: $250 → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8k · 5 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +164% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$8k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+164%
+52%

Still filing today

80%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +16%
  • GC
    Gorton Community Center
    2× · 2018–2021 · $750 · revenue +164%
  • EF
    ELAWA FARM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $450 · revenue +252%

Funded once

  • BP
    BISSELL Pet Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +137%
  • OO
    ORPHANS OF THE STORMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $300 · revenue +187%
  • PC
    PORCHLIGHT COUNSELING SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $280
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation is a separate 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that also serves as the strategic partner for the coordination of fundraising and charitable resources for the Chicago Park District.

Recreation & Sports
2
Forest Preserve Foundation Inc

The mission of the forest preserve foundation is to engage in protecting and restoring the treasured natural habitats within the forest preserve of cook county and to enhance outdoor experiences of all communities.we will do this by…

Environment
3
The Little Forks Conservancy Inc

To permanently protect and improve natural environments in Mid-Michigan by leading and inspiring actions that conserve vital habitats and waterways for the benefit of our entire community.

Environment
4
Friends of Lake Forest Parks & Rec Foundation

The organization's mission is to provide funds for programs, facilities and events for the lake forest parks and recreation department which fall ouside the city of lake forest's budget.

Recreation & Sports
5
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
6
McHenry County Conservation Foundation

To promote, support, assist, sustain and encourage the charitable, educational, scientific and recreational programs, projects and policies of the McHenry County Conservation District and other open space organizations. This is…

Environment
7
Highland Park Conservancy Inc

The mission is to preserve Highland Park's unique heritage and to promote its vast horticultural, educational and recreational resources. Continued on Schedule OWe support planning, management and restoration, and engage the community…

Environment
8
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
9
The Forest Park Conservancy

To protect and restore the ecological health of forest park and marquam nature park, maintain and enhance their extensive trails networks, promote equitable access, and inspire diverse community appreciation and stewardship of these iconic…

Environment
10
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
11
Lake Forest Garden Club

To advance gardening, promote horticulatural knowledge and stimulate the community's interest in conservation and civic beautification.

Environment
12
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lake Forest Open Lands Association; the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
11/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $54,069 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDLAKE FOREST-LAKE BLUFF HISTORY CENTER: $4,000 · OtherLAKE FOREST-LAKE BLUFF HISTORY CENTER+6 more: $3,284 · Other+6 moreBISSELL Pet Foundation: $1,350 · PhilanthropyGorton Community Center: $750 · Human ServicesFOREST PARK CONSERVANCY FKA FOREST PARK PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $250 · Human ServicesORPHANS OF THE STORM: $300 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $200 · AnimalsELAWA FARM FOUNDATION: $450 · Arts & CultureNorth Chicago Community Partners: $250 · EducationLake Forest Police Foundation Inc: $200 · Crime & LegalLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $200 · Environment
Other$61,353Philanthropy$1,350Human Services$1,000Animals$500Arts & Culture$450Education$250Crime & Legal$200Environment$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGorton Community Center: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELAWA FARM FOUNDATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST FOUNDATION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION: $450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Chicago Community Partners: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest Police Foundation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hunting FoundationFL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hunting Foundation · Red Bird Hollow Foundation · Clarks Fork Foundation · Butler Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Robert G Shaw Family Foundation · Little Orchard Foundation · Carney Family Foundation · Hedberg Foundation Inc · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Dick Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anne Hunting Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anne Hunting Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anne Hunting Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Anne Hunting Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anne Hunting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph