Skip to content
Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$115kFood & Nutrition$77kHealth$71kHousing & Shelter$70kScience & Tech$25kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$10kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$463k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GATHER$52,250
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC$25,000
CROSS ROADS HOUSE INC$20,000
THE FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER OF PORTSMOUTH DBA JOAN G LOVERING HEALTH CENTER$10,000
GOODWORK$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC$2,500
HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GATHER: $52k → 5%GATHER: $10k → 5%GATHER: $10k → 5%GATHER: $3k → 5%HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 5%HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 5%HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$358k · 8 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$358k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsHousing & ShelterScience & TechHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • G
    Gather
    4× · 2022–2025 · $75k · revenue +102%
  • CR
    Cross Roads House Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +31%
  • SS
    SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SS
    SEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -44%
  • FI
    For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
New Hampshire Women's Foundation Inc

New hampshire women's foundation invests in opportunity and equality for women and girls in new hampshire through research, advocacy, education and grant making.

Education
3
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
4
Clean Energy Nh

To strengthen new hampshire's economy and conserve natural resources by promoting a transition to clean, efficient, and renewable energy.

Environment
5
New Hampshire Charitable Foundation

We achieve our purpose by: supporting New Hampshire's nonprofit organizations and students; connecting generous people with pressing community needs and effective ways to give; collaborating, building relationships and learning from all of…

Philanthropy
6
Nh Civics

Develop, nurture and maintain an informed, engaged, and civil new hampshire citizenry.

Education
7
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
8
New Hampshire Outright

To create a safe space for youth to explore topics of gender and sexuality in a welcoming and understanding environment.

Youth Development
9
New England Center for Investigative Reporting Inc
—
10
The Childrens Scholarship Fund

The Children's Scholarship Fund (CSF) empowers families by providing children in need with scholarships, and by supporting expanded educational opportunities for all children.

Education
11
New Hampshire Interscholastic Athletic Association

Operations of state wide interscholastic activities involving member schools and their students

—
12
New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute

New hampshire fiscal policy institute promotes opportunity and economic well-being for all new hampshire residents by producing and disseminating independent research and analysis to inform public policy.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spaulding Academy & Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Fuller Foundation of New Hampshire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $115,000 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE…THE FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER OF PORTSMOUTH DBA JOAN G LOVERING HEALTH CENTER: $40,000 · OtherTHE FEMINIST HEALTH CENT…GREATER SEACOAST COMMUNITY HEALTH (FAMILIES FIRST HEALTH & SUPPORT CENTER): $30,000 · OtherGREATER SEACOAST COMMUNI…THE FOUNDATION FOR NH COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $5,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR NH CO…GOODWORK: $5,000 · OtherGOODWORK+6 more: $6,500 · Other+6 moreGather: $75,250 · Human ServicesGatherHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: $3,000 · Human ServicesCross Roads House Inc: $70,000 · Housing & ShelterCross Roads House I…SEE SCIENCE CENTER INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePRESCOTT PARK ARTS FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY COLLEGES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFor Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST): $5,000 · Science & Tech
Civil Rights$115,000Other$86,500Human Services$78,250Housing & Shelter$70,000Arts & Culture$30,000Philanthropy$15,000Science & Tech$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $115,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGather: $75,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCross Roads House Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSEE SCIENCE CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ELMIRA-CORNING AND THE FINGER LAKES INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEACOAST SCIENCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFor Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRESCOTT PARK ARTS FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOREVER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFULLER FOUNDATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Eastern Bank Foundati…Foundation for Seacoa…Eversource Energy Fou…The Schleyer Foundati…Gateway Fund 7522-Xxx…Exeter Hospital IncA Caring Community IncEastern Cambridge Fou…Macdonald Family Foun…Bartko Family Charita…Rosamond Thaxter Foun…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Foundation for Seacoast Health · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · The Schleyer Foundation · Gateway Fund 7522-Xxxxxx00049 · Exeter Hospital Inc · A Caring Community Inc · Eastern Cambridge Foundation · Macdonald Family Foundation · Bartko Family Charitable Foundation · Rosamond Thaxter Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anne & Mike Ambrogi Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home