Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Annapurna Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$348k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$348k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$685kRecreation & Sports$102kEnvironment$21kInternational$18kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$500Health$200
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$347,783
Median grant
1
States reached
$188k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Various Non Profit Organizations$347,783
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE KSHATRIPAS: $2k → 6%UNICEF USA: $9k → 17%SRI RAMA JNANAMANDIR PUB LEAGUE: $7k → 14%Various Non Profit Organizations: $348k → 8%ARCHANGEL ANCIENT TREE ARCHIVE: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $200 → 14%MAI FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 21%BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $700 → 15%ST THOMAS SYRO-MALABAR CHURCH: $3k → 7%FRIENDS OF LINCOLN: $500 → 14%SRI RAMA JNANAMARID: $8k → 8%Various Non Profit Organizations: $233k → 8%INDIA DEVELOPMENT SERVICE: $7k → 14%Various Non Profit Organizations: $103k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $70k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE PARKS: $32k → 8%PLANT CHAMPION TREES FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Farmers for Forests Inc

The mission of Farmers for Forests (F4F) is to restore and protect green cover in India in close partnership with farmers and indigenous communities. All the on-ground work is enabled by AI and multi-spectral drone technology and satellite…

Human Services
2
Indians for Collective Action

ICA's mission is to support sustainable development in India by partnering with dedicated non-government organizations (NGO's) and individuals.

Civil Rights
3
Maharashtra Mandal Chicago

Provide the cultural support to all maharashtrian people now in usa, with roots in maharashtra

Arts & Culture
4
American Federation of Teachers Local 801 Aft

Labor union

5
Friends of International Friendship Park Inc

Creating a safe, accessible, transnational future for friendship park.

Recreation & Sports
6
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
7
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

8
Unite Here 34 Local Fue

The union mission is to secure improved wages, working conditions & other economic advantages for its members through organizing, negotiating & the collective bargaining process through legal and economic means, and other lawful methods.

9
Unite Here Local 33 Graduate Employees At Yale

Improved working conditions and economic advantages for the graduate teaching and research assistants at yale through negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement

10
If Not Us Then Who

Global awareness highlighting the role local peoples play in protecting forests.

Environment
11
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
12
American Friends of the Everest Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fund for Unicef and the most unlike its peers is India Development Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Various Non Profit Organizations — $684,082 · OtherVarious Non Profit Organizations+8 more — $37,451 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE PARKS — $102,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF TH…ARCHANGEL ANCIENT TREE ARCHIVE — $10,000 · EnvironmentBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $700 · EnvironmentUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $8,500 · InternationalMAI FAMILY SERVICES SASHITAL — $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$721,533Education$102,000Environment$10,700International$8,500Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE PARKS — $102,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetARCHANGEL ANCIENT TREE ARCHIVE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndia Development Service — $7,125 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LINCOLN — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAI FAMILY SERVICES SASHITAL — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Annapurna Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph