Skip to content
Ann Maccarthy Parke Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Ann Maccarthy Parke Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$396k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$1.6MHealth$306kRecreation & Sports$102k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $257k
$39,551
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC$98,878
SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$98,878
TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE$59,327
ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC$39,551
TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION$39,551
HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI$39,551
RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC$19,776
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $48k → 9%LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $119k → 19%SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $119k → 21%TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $99k → 19%SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $99k → 21%TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $39k → 9%LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $97k → 19%SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $97k → 21%TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION: $39k → 9%LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $97k → 19%SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $97k → 21%TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE: $23k → 9%LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $57k → 19%SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $57k → 21%TONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE: $17k → 9%LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $42k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $48k → 21%TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $71k → 19%SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $42k → 21%TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $59k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $40k → 21%TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $58k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $39k → 21%TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $58k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $39k → 21%TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $34k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $23k → 21%TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE: $25k → 19%HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $17k → 21%ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $48k → 19%ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 19%ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $39k → 19%ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $39k → 19%RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC: $24k → 19%ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $23k → 19%RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC: $20k → 19%RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC: $19k → 19%RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC: $19k → 19%ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $17k → 19%RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC: $11k → 19%RED HILLS HORSE TRAILS INC: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$2.0M
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $510k · revenue +146%
  • LC
    LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $510k · revenue +26%
  • TM
    TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $306k · revenue +67%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    5/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $510,447 · AnimalsTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATIONLEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $510,447 · AnimalsLEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETYANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $204,179 · AnimalsANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INCHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $204,179 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURIJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $164,624 · AnimalsJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue FoundationTALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE INC: $306,269 · HealthTALLAHASSEE MEMOR…RED HILLS HORSE TRIALS INC: $102,090 · Recreation & SportsTONY LARUSSA'S ANIMAL RESCUE: $39,555 · Other
    Animals$1,593,876Health$306,269Recreation & Sports$102,090Other$39,555

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $510,447 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetLEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $510,447 over 6y, 18% of budgetTALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE INC: $306,269 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC: $204,179 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $204,179 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJoybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation: $164,624 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRED HILLS HORSE TRIALS INC: $102,090 over 6y, 90% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
    • Who funds LEON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE INC ↗
    • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
    • Who funds Joybound People and Pets FKA Tony La Russa's Animal Rescue Foundation ↗
    • Who funds RED HILLS HORSE TRIALS INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
    The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Ann Maccarthy Parke Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann Maccarthy Parke Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare Inc: 0% of income from government
    • Leon County Humane Society: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ann Maccarthy Parke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home