Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$190k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $190k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
5
’18
6
’19
6
’20
6
’21
0
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$2.9MEducation$334kFood & Nutrition$194kHuman Services$97kAnimals$86kCrime & Legal$54k
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $179k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
FOODLINK TULARE COUNTY$25,000
IMAGINE U MUSEUM$25,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY$25,000
WOODLAKE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$25,000
VALLEY OAK SPCA$15,000
CROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH$13,800
READ FOR LIFE$10,500
ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER$10,000
WOODLAKE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$6,350
CASA OF TULARE COUNTY$3,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $132k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $25k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $18k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $15k → 18%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $10k → 18%ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $15k → 18%CROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH: $14k → 18%CROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 18%ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $10k → 18%ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $10k → 18%CROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 80% of Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$717k · 11 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down. Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$717k
$48k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesCivil RightsEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    READ FOR LIFE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $66k · revenue +22% · 41% of their budget
  • CO
    CASA OF TULARE COUNTY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $54k · revenue +59%
  • CV
    CROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • WU
    WOODLAKE USD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ORANGE COVE
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • WH
    WOODLAKE HIGH SCHOOL FFA
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
Friends of Tulare County

Friends of Tulare County is dedicated to promoting the safety, health, and well-being of all residents of Tulare County and strives to assist underrepresented and disadvantaged populations of all ethnicities and cultures through donations,…

Human Services
3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Fresno and Madera Counties

CASA of Fresno and Madera Counties is a 501(c)3 community based nonprofit organization whose mission is to recruit, train, and support citizen volunteers to advocate and speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the…

Civil Rights
4
Tulare County Child Protection Coordinating Council

Provide training, coordinate services, and advocate for policies and practices that protect children

Crime & Legal
5
Fresno Humane Animal Services

To improve the quality of life for Fresno County's animals by providing a full range of progressive animal control services. We focus on education, animal reunification, adoption, as well as community safety. We Protect the public,educate…

Animals
6
Court Appointed Special Advocates (Casa) of Merced County

Advocate for foster care children in courts. Providing quality intervention and advocacy services for abused, abandoned, and neglected children.

Crime & Legal
7
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
8
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
9
Tulare County Deputy Sheriffs Benevolent Association

Enhance the community quality of life

Youth Development
10
Spca of Stanislaus County

Protection and care of animals

Animals
11
Tulare County Workforce Investment Board Incorporated

Commitment to the prosperity of tulare county by shaping and steering the workforce development system.

Public Benefit
12
Fresno Tnr

Providing low cost spaying & neutering of feral and community cats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Tulare County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Assistance Service Dog Educational Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $2,864,397 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $135,500 · OtherIndividual gran…WOODLAKE HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $113,350 · OtherWOODLAKE HIGH S…IMAGINE U MUSEUM: $97,500 · OtherIMAGINE U MUSEU…READ FOR LIFE: $65,500 · OtherREAD FOR LIFEFOODLINK TULARE COUNTY: $50,000 · OtherFOODLINK TULARE…WOODLAKE USD FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Other+3 more: $23,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $67,500 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesCROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH: $29,800 · Human ServicesCASA OF TULARE COUNTY: $53,800 · Civil RightsValley Oak SPCA: $40,850 · AnimalsTULARE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $27,750 · Education
Community Improvement$2,864,397Other$509,850Human Services$132,300Civil Rights$53,800Animals$40,850Education$27,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $2,864,397 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC: $67,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetREAD FOR LIFE: $65,500 over 5y, 41% of budgetCASA OF TULARE COUNTY: $53,800 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetValley Oak SPCA: $40,850 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC: $35,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH: $29,800 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetTULARE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $27,750 over 2y, 23% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds READ FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TULARE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Valley Oak SPCA ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE SERVICE DOG EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CROWN VALLEY YOUTH RANCH ↗
  • Who funds TULARE COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ann B Reimers Charitable Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph