Skip to content

· Public charity

Ann Arbor Spark

Ann Arbor SPARK advances the region by encouraging and supporting business acceleration, attraction, expansion and retention.

$683k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$173k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$4.4MHuman Services$1.8MHealth$1.8MCommunity Improvement$655kFood & Nutrition$384kArts & Culture$300kRecreation & Sports$252kEducation$110kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $582k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Howell Area Chamber of Commerce$172,777
Grand Valley State University$130,568
Jewish Family Services$106,700
Monroe County Business Alliance$96,535
MI-HQ$75,000
Washtenaw Community College$42,324
Tortillas Tita LLC$10,000
University of Michigan$10,000
BCHIRA$7,923
B-Cubed Bakery$7,000
Beara Bakes LLC$7,000
The Mix Studios LLC$7,000
Unity Vibration Kombucha$5,199
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%ZEEMERING FAMILY PET AND HUMAN THER: $10k → 5%YOUNG MENS CHISTIAN ASSOC OF MONRO: $20k → 10%LIVINGSTON FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 5%ADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $15k → 12%FRENCHTOWN CENTER FOR ACTIVE ADULTS: $15k → 10%ADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 12%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF: $9k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $10k → 10%VETERAN EMPOWERMENT NEIGHBORHOODS: $10k → 14%MICHIGAN ABILITY PARTNERS: $10k → 14%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 71 repeat orgs$8.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

71 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 69 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
824

Total granted

$1.7M
$7.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+37%

Still filing today

6%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $505k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HILLSDALE COUNTY AG
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +812%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN
    2× · 2020–2021 · $29k · revenue +118%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $26k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • ME
    MICHIGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP
    one grant, 2020 · $125k
  • NL
    NAIAS LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES OF COLOR
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Macomb County Chamber of Commerce

The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.

Unclassified
2
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
3
Greater Lansing Destination Development Foundation
Community Improvement
4
Lenawee Economic Development Corp

to stimulate economic development, attract new businesses, grow established businesses and support entrepreneurial endeavors in Lenawee County

—
5
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
6
Lapeer Area Chamber of Commerce

The lapeer area chamber of commerce is committed to continiously promoting & fostering the business climate to enhance the quality of life in our community.

—
7
Muskegon Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce

Member programs/services, economic development

—
8
Agricultural Society of Lenawee County

Conduct the lenawee county fair to promote agricultural and horticultural activities in lenawee county. this associations only activity with the exception of off season rentals and storage revenue.

Arts & Culture
9
Monroe County Convention & Tourism Bureau Inc

Promote tourism in monroe county

—
10
Gratiot Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and community growth and development and prepserve the competitive enterprise system of business.

—
11
Michigan Celebrates Small Business

To ignite, unleash and promote a culture of entrepreneurship.

—
12
Laurens County Chamber of Commerce

To make laurens county a better place to live and work.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corner Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Adrian Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 906 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/67
Grantees still filing
49/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOWELL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $172,777 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $136,564 · OtherMICHIGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $124,889 · Other+187 more: $3,240,805 · Other+187 moreMONROE COUNTY BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $96,535 · Community ImprovementADRIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15,000 · Community ImprovementTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN: $28,523 · Human ServicesADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesFRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $10,000 · Human ServicesHILLSDALE COUNTY AG: $30,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC: $26,474 · Youth DevelopmentMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $14,500 · Arts & CultureVETLIFE: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$3,675,035Community Improvement$111,535Human Services$78,523Food & Nutrition$30,000Youth Development$26,474Arts & Culture$14,500Public Benefit$10,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOWELL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $172,777 over 1y, 15% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC: $106,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMONROE COUNTY BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $96,535 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetHILLSDALE COUNTY AG: $30,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN: $28,523 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC: $26,474 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER: $25,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetMONROE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,771 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetFRENCHTOWN SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetADRIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetKIMBALL CAMP Outdoor Center: $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetANN ARBOR FILM FESTIVAL: $15,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetVISIT LENAWEE: $15,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $14,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONROE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $12,630 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHOWELL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetTORCH 180: $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOWELL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COUNTY AG ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LENAWEE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN ARMORY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Washtenaw CountyMI25.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Washtenaw County · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation · Livingston County United Way · The Buhr Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Duffy Foundation · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Small Business Association of Michigan · Food Gatherers · Lenawee Community Foundation · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann Arbor Spark funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann Arbor Spark. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 906 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ann Arbor Spark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph