Skip to content

California · Public charity

Grace Family Vineyards Foundation

Provide education, medical and general welfare assistance to indigent children

$117k
Granted FY2019
2
Itemized grants FY2019
2
Organizations funded FY2019
50%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2019
$23k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2019
$12,500
Largest grant, FY2019
$12,500
Organizations funded a year
2 to 4
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
1
Total assets, FY2019
$13k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 50% of the organizations Grace Family Vineyards Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 44% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
EducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20192$23k50%
FY20184$32k75%
FY20174$29kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Youth Development$37kEducation$26kHealth$15kInternational$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2019, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Teens Connect$29,50037%
Oxbow School$10,0001n/a
The Michael J Nelson Foundation$10,0001n/a
American Canyon Hs Alliance$10,00014%
Tangible Hope Foundation$7,5001n/a
Tibetan Village Project$6,3751n/a
Don'T Ever Give Up Inc (V Foundation Endowment Fund)$5,0001n/a
Tibet Fund Inc$5,00010%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Grace Family Vineyards Foundation with peer funders

About Grace Family Vineyards Foundation

How much does Grace Family Vineyards Foundation give?
Grace Family Vineyards Foundation reported 2 itemized grants totaling $22,500, out of $116,932 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Grace Family Vineyards Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Youth Development (44%), Education (32%), Health (18%).
Who are Grace Family Vineyards Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2019: Teens Connect ($30k), Oxbow School ($10k), The Michael J Nelson Foundation ($10k).
Does Grace Family Vineyards Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Grace Family Vineyards Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Grace Family Vineyards Foundation based?
Grace Family Vineyards Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grace Family Vineyards’ filings →

More from the funding graph