Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anita P Gilger Trust Ua

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$215kYouth Development$108kAnimals$101kEducation$86kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAKE ERIE NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER$81,000
THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC$10,000
THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PIONEER VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CHARTER SCHOOL: $15k → 12%NORTH QUABBIN CITIZEN ADVOCACY: $15k → 14%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $17k → 13%LAKE ERIE NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER: $81k → 17%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $16k → 5%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $16k → 13%LAKE ERIE NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER: $10k → 17%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $16k → 5%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $16k → 13%LAKE ERIE NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER: $10k → 17%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $10k → 5%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $16k → 13%LAKE ERIE NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER: $5k → 17%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $10k → 5%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $16k → 13%LAKE ERIE NATURE & SCIENCE CENTER: $3k → 17%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $10k → 5%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $10k → 13%APOLLO'S FIRE: $8k → 17%PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $10k → 5%THE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $10k → 13%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $16k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $16k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $15k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $15k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $15k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $15k → 17%CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL: $10k → 17%ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $10k → 17%THE HERMIT CLUB: $8k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $16k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $16k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $15k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $15k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $15k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $10k → 17%THE CLEVELAND ORCHESTRA: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$477k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$477k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+9%

Still filing today

80%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LE
    LAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER
    5× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +113%
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $101k · revenue +8%
  • TM
    The Musical Arts Association
    7× · 2018–2024 · $96k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • NQ
    NORTH QUABBIN CITIZEN ADVOCACY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +16%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE PIONEER VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • CF
    CLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
2
The Cleveland Modern Dance Association

To be a national model for how a presenting organization serves its community, leveraging the worlds best modern and contemporary dance to inspire and educate audiences, local dancers, and community members.

—
3
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
4
Cleveland Pops Orchestra

The cleveland pops orchestra, led by conductor carl topilow, performs the highest quality symphonic pops music to entertain and enrich a wide and diverse audience and provides educational programs to develop an enduring appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
5
Cuyahoga Valley Art Center

Cuyahoga valley art center fosters an appreciation of visual art through education, exhibition, and community enrichment opportunities. guided by a vision of a community where everyone has access to visual art, cvac provides diverse and…

Arts & Culture
6
Philadelphia Film Society

The philadelphia film society (pfs) is the region's home for classic and contemporary film presentation, education, entertainment, and community building. a nonprofit, community-supported organization, pfs produces the acclaimed…

Arts & Culture
7
Cleveland Botanical Garden

The cleveland botanical garden connects people with the wonder, beauty, and value of trees and plants, to inspire action for healthy communities.

Environment
8
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
9
Queen City Chamber Opera Dba Queen City Opera

Classical music performances in Cincinnati.

Arts & Culture
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
Akron Art Museum

To enrich lives through modern and contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
12
Great Lakes Museum of Science Environment and Technology

Our mission is to make science, technology, engineering, and math (stem) come alive, and our vision is a community where all people value stem to inform decision making and enrich lives. (continued on schedule o)guiding principles: we help…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Society for the Blind; the most unlike its peers is Phillips Exeter Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER: $109,000 · Arts & CultureLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTERThe Musical Arts Association: $96,000 · Arts & CultureThe Musical Arts AssociationCLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INC: $100,250 · OtherTHE GIRL FRIENDS FUND INCFRIENDS OF THE PIONEER VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE PIONEER VALL…THE HERMIT CLUB: $7,500 · OtherTHE HERMIT CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $101,000 · AnimalsTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL …PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $71,000 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER…NORTH QUABBIN CITIZEN ADVOCACY INC: $15,000 · Civil Rights
Arts & Culture$215,000Other$130,250Animals$101,000Education$71,000Civil Rights$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKE ERIE NATURE AND SCIENCE CENTER: $109,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $101,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Musical Arts Association: $96,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $71,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH QUABBIN CITIZEN ADVOCACY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PIONEER VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCLEVELAND FILM SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anita P Gilger Trust Ua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anita P Gilger Trust Ua. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anita P Gilger Trust Ua?

    Find your warmest path to Anita P Gilger Trust Ua through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anita P Gilger Trust Ua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph