Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anil & Bharti Patil Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$107kHealth$31kPublic Benefit$14kAnimals$9kHuman Services$9kArts & Culture$4kCommunity Improvement$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$801
Median grant
5
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JSS MISSION$17,853
SAMARTHANAM USA$5,872
AKKA$2,250
KANNADA KOOTA NY INC$1,412
Individual grant recipient$1,001
AGASTYA GURUKULAM$1,001
ROTARY CLUB OF JERICHO SUNRISE$801
GIVESTAR$651
HUMAN GLORY$501
Individual grant recipient$501
Individual grant recipient$501
INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY VOICE$251
PEOPLE FOR FOREST AND WILDLIFE$251
Individual grant recipient$251
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SAMARTHANAM USA: $6k → 17%AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSE: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
CA
WV
MD
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$134k · 13 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
28

Total granted

$134k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+57%

Still filing today

23%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    JSS MISSION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $99k
  • XI
    XXCODERS INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $14k · revenue +4% · 100% of their budget
  • KK
    KANNADA KOOTA NY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7k

Funded once

  • ST
    SAMARTHANAM TRUST OF DISABLED
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • MS
    MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CEN
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • BC
    BOSTON CHILDREN HOSPITAL TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
2
Lakshmi Cow Sanctuary Inc
Animals
3
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
4
Sindhi Association of North America
5
Dharithree Usa Inc
Public Benefit
6
Matsya Inc
Religion
7
Swadesh Homes Inc
8
Westchester Music of India Group Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Gujaratis of North America
Arts & Culture
10
Shri Yoga Inc
Health
11
Sri Aurobindo Learning Center
12
Prasaad
Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Indian Community Houseinc and the most unlike its peers is Xxcoders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JSS MISSION — $99,139 · OtherJSS MISSIONSAMARTHANAM TRUST OF DISABLED — $20,000 · OtherSAMARTHANAM TRUST OF DISABLEDKANNADA KOOTA NY INC — $7,419 · Other+39 more — $37,454 · Other+39 moreXXCODERS INC — $14,000 · Public BenefitSAMARTHANAM USA INC — $5,872 · Human ServicesAMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSEINC — $1,502 · Human ServicesSewa International Inc — $301 · Human ServicesChildren's Hospital Corporation — $2,001 · HealthAGASTYA GURUKULAM — $1,001 · Arts & CultureINDIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND — $550 · Arts & CultureGAYATRI PARIWAR OF LONG ISLAND INC — $251 · Arts & CultureGOVINDA GOSHALA COW HAVEN INC — $1,502 · Animals
Other$164,012Public Benefit$14,000Human Services$7,675Health$2,001Arts & Culture$1,802Animals$1,502

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetXXCODERS INC — $14,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetSAMARTHANAM USA INC — $5,872 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $2,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVEERASHAIVA SAMAJA OF NORTH AMERICA — $2,001 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSEINC — $1,502 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGASTYA GURUKULAM — $1,001 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND — $550 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSewa International Inc — $301 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAYATRI PARIWAR OF LONG ISLAND INC — $251 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds XXCODERS INC
  • Who funds SAMARTHANAM USA INC
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds VEERASHAIVA SAMAJA OF NORTH AMERICA
  • Who funds GOVINDA GOSHALA COW HAVEN INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSEINC
  • Who funds AGASTYA GURUKULAM
  • Who funds INDIA ASSOCIATION OF LONG ISLAND
  • Who funds STARFLOWER EXPERIENCES INC
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anil & Bharti Patil Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anil & Bharti Patil Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Anil & Bharti Patil Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph