· Private foundation
Ani Mamin Foundation
Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k1032 grants · $251k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,360 |
| Central fund of Israel | $8,250 |
| Cong Bnei Yakov Yosef | $7,000 |
| Central fund of Israel | $5,440 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,650 |
| Cong Ohel Torah | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| The Central Fund of Israel | $3,000 |
| The Central Fund of Israel | $2,700 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +58% for those funded once.
212 repeat relationships: 103 still active in FY2020, 109 since wound down; 175 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CFCentral Fund of Israel4× · 2017–2020 · $53k · revenue +145%
- CYCHASDEI YONA MEIR2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +821%
- MSM & S KOLEL GROCERY2× · 2018–2020 · $5k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $23k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $14k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $9k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
How this is measured
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 687 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Blum Foundation · The Gds Foundation · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Hf Foundation · Bzl Foundation · A&E Hauer Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ani Mamin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ani Mamin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Ani Mamin’s filings →