Skip to content
Angels for Kids Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Angels for Kids Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$41kHealth$11kArts & Culture$6kReligion$4kRecreation & Sports$2kYouth Development$875Community Improvement$839International$382Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$225
Median grant
2
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$11,457
FIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY$5,014
GRACE MEDICAL HOME$3,004
PARKER STREET MINISTRIES$1,268
UCP$1,244
CAMP GILEAD POLK CITY$375
Individual grant recipient$225
Individual grant recipient$165
Individual grant recipient$165
Individual grant recipient$165
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$141
Individual grant recipient$100
DWYERFIRE GOLDSTAR FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CARALYRIELLE ASH HAINES: $252 → 10%ELENA RENELLA: $234 → 11%MIA RIVERA: $225 → 13%CAMP GILEAD POLK CITY: $375 → 16%CALLATHREAL ASH HAINES: $375 → 13%RHETT ROBBINS: $300 → 11%FIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY: $5k → 13%ACE ROBBINS: $279 → 11%FIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGANCY: $4k → 13%GRACE MEDICAL HOME: $3k → 13%FIRST LIFE: $3k → 13%NELLIE PEREZ: $198 → 16%GRACE MEDICAL HOME: $3k → 13%PARKER STREET: $1k → 16%FIRST LIFE: $3k → 13%PARKER STREET MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%GRACE MEDICAL HOME: $3k → 13%PARKER STREET: $1k → 16%FIRST LIFE: $2k → 13%PARKER STREET: $1k → 16%GRACE MEDICAL HOME: $2k → 13%PARKER STREET MINISTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES: $839 → 16%FIRST LIFE: $2k → 13%PARKER STREET: $565 → 16%GRACE MEDICAL HOME INC: $2k → 13%KAITLYN ARANDA: $425 → 16%TORIN TRAINA: $200 → 16%GRACE MEDICAL HOME: $458 → 13%UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $956 → 13%HOUSE OF HOPE: $305 → 13%MIA RIVERA: $351 → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $11k → 13%THE SALVATION ARMY: $7k → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $6k → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 13%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 13%SASHA KERTCHER: $500 → 13%AMBER LEWIS: $425 → 13%ALANI BUEHLER: $425 → 13%UCP: $1k → 13%BETHANY: $1k → 13%UCP: $747 → 13%UCP: $640 → 13%UCP: $629 → 13%UCP: $381 → 13%FELICITY AMELIA AND JULISSA GONZALE: $340 → 13%OLIVIA SMITH: $200 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
20

Total granted

$73k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+12%

Still filing today

27%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $38k
  • GM
    Grace Medical Home Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue -8%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2020–2023 · $10k

Funded once

  • FL
    FIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGANCY
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • B
    BETHANY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • UC
    UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $956 · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $37,786 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $10,231 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGNANCY: $5,014 · OtherFIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGNANCYPARKER STREET: $3,950 · OtherPARKER STREETFIRST LIFE CENTER FOR PREGANCY: $3,680 · OtherUCP: $3,641 · Other+27 more: $8,354 · Other+27 moreGrace Medical Home Inc: $13,114 · HealthGrace Medical Hom…UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $956 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL P…PARKER STREET MINISTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES: $2,107 · Community ImprovementSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $523 · ReligionDWYERFIRE GOLDSTAR FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Public Benefit
Other$72,656Health$14,070Community Improvement$2,107Religion$523Public Benefit$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGrace Medical Home Inc: $13,114 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPARKER STREET MINISTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES: $2,107 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $956 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $523 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDWYERFIRE GOLDSTAR FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Grace Medical Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARKER STREET MINISTRIES INC AND SUBSIDIARIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds DWYERFIRE GOLDSTAR FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angels for Kids Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angels for Kids Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • United Cerebral Palsy of Central Florida Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Angels for Kids Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Angels for Kids Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Angels for Kids’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home