Skip to content

· Private foundation

Angellilly Foundation Charitable Trust Aka Angellilly Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Youth Development$78kReligion$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kCommunity Improvement$13kRecreation & Sports$6kCrime & Legal$4kHuman Services$2kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$100
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW BEGINNINGS CHURCH$24,515
LIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES$6,575
Individual grant recipient$2,775
CHURCH OF CHRIST AT GOLD HILL ROAD$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$783
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$496
PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA$480
Individual grant recipient$480
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $8k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $6k → 15%THE BETHLEHEM HOUSE: $498 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
RI
MD
AZ
AR
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 10 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
35

Total granted

$132k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+13%

Still filing today

40%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    I Believe in Me Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $70k · revenue +13%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +22%
  • TO
    TEAM OF WE HAPPYVILLE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +549%

Funded once

  • DB
    DEERFIELD BEACH CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • WO
    WINTER OAK FUNERAL HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Center for Youth Services Inc

We partner with youth to realize their full potential, by creating opportunities, removing barriers, and promoting racial justice.

Human Services
2
Youth Home Inc

To equip and empower youth, adults, and families to become healthier and contributing members of the community by providing compassionate emotional and behavioral intensive residential treatment & qualified residential treatment for ages…

Health
3
Camden Center for Youth Development Inc

To educate and train troubled youth to become productive citizens

Crime & Legal
4
American Youthworks

American youthworks (ayw) annually provides 400+ young adults with training and resources to build careers and strengthen their communities through education, paid career training, and national service. ayw programs prepare participants…

—
5
Community Youth Services

Empowers youth at-risk and their families to meet goals for safety, stability, belonging and success by providing a continuum of individualized services and advocacy.

Human Services
6
Hope for Youth Inc

Hope For Youth is dedicated to facilitating positive change in the lives of children,adolescents and families. We provide stable,nurturing,residential care,foster care,preventive and out-patient programs which educate,motivate and empower…

—
7
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
8
YouthCARE

Promote respect for self and others, develop future leaders, and provide youth with positive multicultural activities and relationships with caring adults.

—
9
Comprehensive Youth Services of Fresno Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing a full range of services to help eliminate child abuse and neglect. the organization strives to build healthy families through prevention, intervention, treatment and education about alternatives…

Crime & Legal
10
Youth Guidance

A leader in social and emotional development, community engagement, and positive youth development, Youth Guidance has strategically created programs to address community needs across four delivery areas: Community & Afterschool Programs…

Education
11
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
12
Chicago Youth Centers

To provide high-quality early learning and out-of-school time enrichment in under-resourced neighborhoods to holistically support children of all ages, their families, and their communities.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centers for Youth and Families Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Team of We Happyville. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW BEGINNINGS CHURCH: $24,515 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS CHURCHTRUE HOLINESS SAINTS CENTER: $19,000 · OtherTRUE HOLINESS SAINTS CENTERLIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIES: $11,412 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE MISSION MINISTRIESDEERFIELD BEACH CHURCH OF CHRIST: $7,500 · OtherDEERFIELD BEACH CHURCH OF CHRISTIndividual grant recipient: $4,271 · OtherWINTER OAK FUNERAL HOME: $4,240 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,100 · Other+37 more: $46,111 · Other+37 moreI Believe in Me Inc: $69,698 · Youth DevelopmentI Believe in Me IncTEAM OF WE HAPPYVILLE: $6,050 · Youth DevelopmentTEAM OF WE HAPPYVILLE+1 more: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $13,424 · Human ServicesBETHLEHEM HOUSE INC: $498 · Human Services+1 more: $461 · Human ServicesPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $1,462 · InternationalCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $243 · Philanthropy
Other$121,149Youth Development$78,248Human Services$14,383International$1,462Philanthropy$243

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI Believe in Me Inc: $69,698 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $13,424 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM OF WE HAPPYVILLE: $6,050 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetASPIRE MOVEMENT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $1,462 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETHLEHEM HOUSE INC: $498 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $461 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $243 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds I Believe in Me Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds TEAM OF WE HAPPYVILLE ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE MOVEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angellilly Foundation Charitable Trust Aka Angellilly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angellilly Foundation Charitable Trust Aka Angellilly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Angellilly Foundation Charitable Trust Aka Angellilly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph