· Community foundation
Angelina County Community Fund Inc
Assist in community programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $219,229 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $227,727 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,498 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Salvation Army | $64,000 |
| Angelina County Sr Citizens | $49,391 |
| Individual grant recipient | $36,266 |
| Boys & Girls Club of East Tx | $14,870 |
| Hospice in the Pines | $13,277 |
| Alcohol & Drug Abuse Council | $13,277 |
| Angelina County Protective | $12,215 |
| Hope Center | $10,622 |
| Lufkin Workshop | $5,311 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $517k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACANGELINA COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENSINC8× · 2017–2024 · $374k · revenue +58%
- BGBoys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas8× · 2017–2024 · $127k · revenue +16%
- ADALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL DEEP EAST TEXAS8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- TSThe Salvation Armyone grant, 2017 · $60k
- VSVOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCILone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -20%
- LWLUFKIN WORKSHOPone grant, 2018 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.
To provide support programs for residents at the Denton State Supported Living Center including education programs, supplemental living needs and medical equipment.
Enhancing the life of residents of the Abilene State Supported Living Center
Treatment of handicapped and disabled children and adults and providing job training for disabled persons. Providing activities for Alzheimer's Disease patients.
Assist in community programs.
The Mantooth House is a Recovery Residence for Chemically Dependent adult women who have successfully completed primary treatment and are in early, but active recovery. We exist to provide quality recovery housing and bridge the gap…
To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.
Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance
Texas Legal Services Center is a nonprofit legal aid organization whose mission is to serve the undeserved by making civil justice accessible to every Texan--no matter their ability to earn. We're a coalition of attorneys, paralegals, pro…
Support the needs of sexually active pregnant and mothering women and their families
The mission of the walworth county care center is to provide access to long-term care services in a high quality, compassionate, and dignified manner to residents in walworth county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteer Services Council and the most unlike its peers is Lufkin Adult Learning Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANGELINA COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENSINC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas ↗
- Who funds ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE COUNCIL DEEP EAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE IN THE PINES INC ↗
- Who funds JDS CENTER OF HOPE Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Diboll Boosters Club Inc ↗
- Who funds LUFKIN ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tll Temple Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Angelina County Community Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.