Skip to content
Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club at a glance

· Public charity

Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club

The mission of the angelina benefit rodeo association is to organize and coordinate a benefit rodeo to raise funds to support local charitable organizations in their humanitarian endeavors.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$208kRecreation & Sports$187kYouth Development$55kFood & Nutrition$25kHealth$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHousing & Shelter$8kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $44,360, the rows itemized in this filing. The $64,110 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN MEN'S JOB$17,695
ANGELINA FAIR FOUNDATION$10,000
ANGELINA COUNTY EXPO CENTER$9,165
COMMUNITY FOOD DRIVE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%LUFKIN STATE SCHOOL VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL: $63k → 16%LUFKIN STATE SCHOOL VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL: $50k → 16%LUFKIN STATE SCHOOL VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL: $26k → 16%LUFKIN STATE SCHOOL VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 6 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$461k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+40%

Still filing today

83%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationAnimalsYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $181k · revenue -150%
  • VS
    VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue -81% · 58% of their budget
  • AC
    ANGELINA COUNTY FAIR FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • MH
    MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF EAST TEXASgraduated
    3× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY ADULT DAYCARE
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • LN
    LUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONGgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Angelina County Community Fund Inc

Assist in community programs.

Philanthropy
2
Lubbock Chamber of Commerce

The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.

—
3
Duplin County Agri-Community Center Foundation
Community Improvement
4
Lake Fork Community Foundation
—
5
Linvin Scholarship Foundation
—
6
Seguin-Guadalupe County Heritage Museum Inc
—
7
Lakin Community Empowerment Group
Community Improvement
8
Angelina Arts Alliance Inc

To enrich, entertain and educate by presenting and promoting the arts in east texas.

Arts & Culture
9
Angela Stanford Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to serve children and young adults in our community, particularly those whose families have been affected by cancer.

Philanthropy
10
Laughlin Memorial Inc
—
11
Angelina County Senior Citizensinc

To provide nutritional meals and activities for senior citizens.

Human Services
12
Lubbock-Cooper Education Foundation

1) provide supplemental support and educational opportunities to students of lubbock-cooper independent school district ("lcisd"), including efforts to increase student success in learning and preparation for higher education and the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Angelina Roadrunner Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Communities Cinco De Mayo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL: $153,590 · Human ServicesVOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCILChristian Mens Job Corps of Lufkin Texas: $25,195 · Human ServicesChristian Mens Job Corps of Lufkin TexasTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE MOSAIC CENTER INCANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC: $181,041 · Recreation & SportsANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INCANGELINA COUNTY FAIR FOUNDATION: $55,370 · Youth DevelopmentANGELINA COU…COMMUNITY FOOD DRIVE: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY …SALVATION ARMY ADULT DAYCARE: $8,000 · OtherSALVATION …PVA PEDRO FLORES VOLLEYBALL ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · OtherPVA PEDRO …SAN AUGUSTINE LIONS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherSAN AUGUST…ALTO LIONS CLUB: $5,000 · OtherALTO LIONS…MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF EAST TEXAS: $10,000 · HealthLUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITIES CINCO DE MAYO: $5,000 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF ANGELINA COUNTY TEXAS: $5,000 · Animals
Human Services$199,785Recreation & Sports$181,041Youth Development$55,370Other$49,000Health$10,000Housing & Shelter$7,500Education$5,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANGELINA COUNTY EXPOSITION CENTER INC: $181,041 over 8y, 9.4% of budgetVOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL: $153,590 over 6y, 58% of budgetANGELINA COUNTY FAIR FOUNDATION: $55,370 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetChristian Mens Job Corps of Lufkin Texas: $25,195 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTHE MOSAIC CENTER INC: $21,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetMEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF EAST TEXAS: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLUFKIN NEIGHBORHOOD STRONG: $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES CINCO DE MAYO: $5,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pineywoods Founda…Tll Temple FoundationErnest L Kurth Jr Cha…The Bettye & Murphy G…Simon & Louise Hender…Mary K and Clifford G…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pineywoods FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pineywoods Foundation · Tll Temple Foundation · Ernest L Kurth Jr Charitable Foundation · The Bettye & Murphy George Foundation · Simon & Louise Henderson Foundation · Mary K and Clifford Grum Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Angelina Benefit Rodeo Foundation of the Lufkin Host Lions Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home