Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Illinois · Private foundation

Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
5
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$36,585
States reached, FY2022
2
Total assets, FY2022
$16k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
83% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$38kEducation$1kHealth$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Refuge Recovery World Services Inc$1,00010%
St Patrick High School$1,0001n/a

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($38k), not named here.

Compare Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc with peer funders

About Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc

How much does Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc give?
Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc reported 5 grants totaling $39,935 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2022, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (85%), Education (2%), Health (2%).
Who are Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2022: Refuge Recovery World Services Inc ($1k), St Patrick High School ($1k).
Does Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc based?
Angel of Lower Wacker Drive Fund Inc is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Angel of Lower Wacker Drive’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home