Skip to content

· Private foundation

Andy and Nancy Thompson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$338kArts & Culture$115kFood & Nutrition$65kHealth$55kEducation$30kRecreation & Sports$22kAnimals$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gill Children's Services$25,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$15,000
Humane Society of North Texas$15,000
Tunnels to Towers Foundation$10,000
Harris MethodistTHR Foundation$10,000
Cooks Childrens Hospital$10,000
Meals on Wheels$10,000
American Red Cross$7,500
Wounded Warriors$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%American Red Cross: $8k → 14%Meals on Wheels: $10k → 11%The Red Cross: $3k → 14%Meals on Wheels: $5k → 11%Meals on Wheels: $5k → 11%Meals on Wheels: $5k → 11%Meals on Wheels: $5k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $30k → 11%Lena Pope Home: $25k → 11%Lena Pope: $25k → 11%Lena Pope: $15k → 11%Lena Pope: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$722k · 12 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$722k
$3k

Still filing today

83%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $131k · revenue +103%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $115k · revenue +1%
  • LP
    LENA POPE HOME INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $110k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Salvation Army
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
2
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
3
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
4
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
5
Central Texas Food Bank Inc

To increase food access in Central Texas by providing nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through programs, education, and innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
6
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
7
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
8
The Houston Food Bank

Houston food bank's mission is to provide food for better lives. last year we provided access to 136 million nutritious meals in 18 counties in southeast texas through our 1,600 community partners which includes food pantries, soup…

—
9
Memorial Hermann Community Benefit Corporation

To implement solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community. we collaborate with others as well as create signature, evidence-based ways to improve the communities where people live, work, learn…

Social Science
10
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
11
United Way of Tarrant County

As a nonprofit leader, uwtc mobilizes our community to action so all can thrive. we identify critical needs, foster collaboration and invest in solutions that drive change. our programs serve nearly 400,000 people each year.

Philanthropy
12
Child Care Associates

Cca's mission is to assist family successes through excellence in comprehensive early education and development services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tarrant Area Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Warm Place: $89,000 · OtherThe Warm PlaceTarrant Area Food Bank: $35,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankHarris MethodistTHR Foundation: $10,000 · OtherCooks Childrens Hospital: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $10,000 · OtherGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $131,000 · EducationGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICE…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL T…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $10,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSLENA POPE HOME INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INCMEALS ON WHEELS: $30,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELSAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $115,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH MUSEU…Texas Health Resources Foundation: $45,000 · HealthJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $22,382 · Recreation & SportsHumane Society of North Texas: $15,000 · Animals
Other$259,000Education$161,000Human Services$150,000Arts & Culture$115,000Health$45,000Recreation & Sports$22,382Animals$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $131,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $115,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $45,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $30,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetJOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC: $22,382 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas Health Resources Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds JOHN AUSTIN CHELEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andy and Nancy Thompson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andy and Nancy Thompson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Andy and Nancy Thompson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Andy and Nancy Thompson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andy and Nancy Thompson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph