Skip to content
Andrews Marie B Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Andrews Marie B Tuw

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$79k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$283kEducation$204k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
$5,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNERSTONE VNA - ROCHESTER DISTRICT VNA$46,409
GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,500
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$5,500
Fashion Institute of Technology FDN$5,500
SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSITY$5,000
Bridgewater State University Foundation$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Bridgewater State University Foundation: $5k → 8%LASELL COLLEGE: $7k → 8%GORDON COLLEGE: $4k → 10%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%WESTERN NEW ENGLAND: $6k → 17%HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 6%Fashion Institute of Technology FDN: $6k → 17%AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%POST UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $3k → 8%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6k → 8%ST MICHAELS COLLEGE: $2k → 10%GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16k → 5%SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $4k → 7%SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 7%CORNERSTONE VNA - ROCHESTER DISTRICT VNA: $58k → 9%PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 10%PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 10%SAINT JOSPEH'S COLLEGE: $3k → 7%YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 9%CENTRAL MAINE COMM COLLEGE: $4k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE: $3k → 15%LASELL COLLEGE: $5k → 8%EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $3k → 16%GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16k → 5%SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%CORNERSTONE VNA - ROCHESTER DISTRICT VNA: $56k → 9%PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 5%CORNERSTONE VNA - ROCHESTER DISTRICT VNA: $54k → 9%HUSSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8k → 5%CORNERSTONE VNA - ROCHESTER DISTRICT VNA: $49k → 9%HUSSAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%GREAT BAY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 5%CORNERSTONE VNA - ROCHESTER DISTRICT VNA: $46k → 9%CORNERSTONE VNA: $36k → 9%CORNERSTONE VNA: $31k → 9%WAGNER COLLEGE: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $23k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $17k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMSHIRE: $7k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $4k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $4k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMSHIRE: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
NY
MA
CT
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$491k · 8 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
18

Total granted

$491k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+2%

Still filing today

50%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    Cornerstone VNA
    7× · 2020–2026 · $329k · revenue +43%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
    5× · 2022–2026 · $53k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
    5× · 2020–2026 · $51k

Funded once

  • SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +2%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +22%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

—
11
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Cornerstone Vna. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cornerstone VNA: $329,126 · HealthCornerstone VNAUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $53,481 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRECOMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $50,843 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEW…PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · OtherPLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMSHIRE: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMSHIREIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherFASHION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Other+6 more: $17,400 · Other+6 moreHusson University: $14,375 · EducationHusson Universi…LASELL UNIVERSITY: $12,420 · EducationLASELL UNIVERSI…Southern New Hampshire University: $7,000 · EducationSouthern New Ha…SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationSUFFOLK UNIVERS…NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UN…RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERS…Bridgewater State University Foundation: $5,000 · EducationBridgewater Sta…SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $4,250 · EducationSAINT ANSELM CO…GORDON COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationEMMANUEL COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationLake Forest College: $3,000 · Education+5 more: $8,900 · Education+5 more
Health$329,126Other$156,724Education$79,445

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCornerstone VNA: $329,126 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHusson University: $14,375 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLASELL UNIVERSITY: $12,420 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $4,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL COLLEGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest College: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAGNER COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $1,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFranklin Pierce University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity FoundationThe Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity FoundationMA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andrews Marie B Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andrews Marie B Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Lasell University: 4% of income from government
  • Suffolk University: 1% of income from government
  • Gordon College: 1% of income from government
  • Emmanuel College: 0% of income from government
  • Saint Michael's College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Andrews Marie B Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home