Skip to content

· Private foundation

Andis Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$209k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$403kHuman Services$175kYouth Development$107kEducation$101kHealth$88kCommunity Improvement$58kAnimals$36kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $166k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY (RACINE WI)$45,500
PAWSPERITY INC$25,000
UNITED WAY (RACINE WI)$20,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (RACINE)$20,000
WISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC$15,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) RACINE COUNTY$10,000
STRONGER FAMILIES$10,000
UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER$10,000
SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF METROPOLITAN MILWAUKEE INC$7,500
SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN YOUTH FOR CHRIST$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HOSPITALITY CENTER$5,000
RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$5,000
HOMETOWN HEROES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PAWSPERITY INC: $25k → 15%HOMETOWN HEROES INC: $5k → 6%DOGSINVESTS INC: $3k → 8%PAWSPERITY INC: $15k → 15%HOMETOWN HEROES INC: $5k → 6%SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 17%RACINE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $58k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
CA
MO
AZ
AR
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$818k · 25 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
35

Total granted

$818k
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

60%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W4
    WISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +294%
  • SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +51%
  • RZ
    RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • RC
    RACINE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $58k · revenue +48%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -66%
  • AO
    ADRC OF RACINE COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
2
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

—
3
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
4
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
7
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
10
Pharmacy Society of Wisconsin Inc

Provide a unified voice, resources, and leadership to advance the pharmacy profession and improve the quality of medication use in wisconsin.

—
11
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
12
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Think Pineapple Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
24/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY (RACINE WI): $373,100 · OtherUNITED WAY (RACINE WI)YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (RACINE): $90,000 · OtherYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (RACINE)NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS (NAMI) RACINE COUNTY: $36,500 · Other+50 more: $271,744 · Other+50 moreRACINE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $57,500 · Human ServicesRACINE COUNTY …PAWSPERITY INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesPAWSPERITY INCSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesSECUREFUTURES …HOMETOWN HEROES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOMETOWN HEROE…+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesWISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · Youth DevelopmentCOPS N KIDS READING CENTER INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentL&J EMPOWERMENT INC: $40,000 · EmploymentRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 · AnimalsWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $1,000 · AnimalsThe Conscious Kid: $20,000 · EducationDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $5,000 · Education+3 more: $800 · EducationEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 · Civil Rights
Other$771,344Human Services$140,000Youth Development$72,500Employment$40,000Animals$26,000Education$25,800Civil Rights$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRACINE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $57,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetL&J EMPOWERMENT INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPBA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRACINE ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRONGER FAMILIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOMETOWN HEROES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPS N KIDS READING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTRUE SKOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetA GIVING HEART FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDOGSINVESTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS MISSION NFP: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sisters of Greater Racine Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $435 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASME FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONNENBERG SCHOOL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF EASTERN WISCONSIN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE HARBORS COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXANDER LEIGH CENTER FOR AUTISM: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST ATHLETES AGAINST CHILDHOOD CANCER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RACINE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN 4-H FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds L&J EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PBA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Conscious Kid ↗
  • Who funds RACINE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WISCONSIN FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RACINE ART MUSEUM ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER BEND NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER ↗
  • Who funds STRONGER FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds HOMETOWN HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF METRO MILWAUKEE ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD ↗
  • Who funds COPS N KIDS READING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUE SKOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Racine Community Foundation IncWI19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Racine Community Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Lang Family Foundation Inc · Ec Styberg Foundation Inc · United Way of Racine County Inc · Brewers Community Foundation Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph