Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anderson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$7.2MHuman Services$3.3MEducation$2.2MYouth Development$822kReligion$110kRecreation & Sports$51kHousing & Shelter$33kArts & Culture$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $366k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$250,000
SALK INSTITUTE$150,000
OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$100,000
UW FOUNDATION FBO HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
PEDIATRIC INTERIM CARE CENTER$100,000
KINDERING CENTER$100,000
UW MEDICINE MEMORY & BRAIN WELLNESS CENTER$100,000
SALVATION ARMY$80,000
YWCA$60,000
BELLEVUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$60,000
EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION$60,000
RYTHER CHILD CENTER$50,000
AKIN$50,000
WHITMAN COLLEGE$50,000
SEATTLE CHILDRENS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $908k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COFFEE OASIS: $3k → 10%AMARA: $50k → 9%AMARA: $50k → 9%AMARA: $50k → 9%AMARA: $50k → 9%AMARA: $30k → 9%AMARA: $30k → 9%AMARA: $30k → 9%AMARA: $30k → 9%AMARA: $30k → 9%NEW HORIZONS MINISTIRES: $5k → 9%CANCER PATHWAYS: $5k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $20k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $20k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $20k → 9%CHILD CARE RESOURCES: $18k → 9%AKIN: $50k → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $72k → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $60k → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $60k → 9%EVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%EVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $40k → 9%FAMILY LAW CASA: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
IA
PA
CA
CO
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 54 repeat orgs$695k to everyone else

54 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
24

Total granted

$13M
$504k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+65%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $191k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $710k · revenue +89%
  • KC
    KINDERING CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $685k · revenue +92%
  • BB
    BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $465k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • UM
    UW MEMORY & BRIAN WELLNESS
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • HM
    HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
2
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
3
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health
4
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
5
Lake Union Child Care

Hutch Kids Child Care Center's mission is to provide quality, on-site child care services to the employee families of Fed Hutchinson Cancer Center, the University of Washington, their partners, and families from the community.

Unclassified
6
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
7
Seattle Children's Guild Association

Seattle children's guild association advocates for seattle children's hospital through volunteer, philanthropic and community endeavors to ensure hope, excellent care and advanced cures for children.

—
8
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
9
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
10
School's Out Washington

School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.

Youth Development
11
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
12
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Home Society of Washington; the most unlike its peers is Cush It to the Limit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/49
Grantees still filing
32/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALK INSTITUTE: $1,275,000 · OtherSALK INSTITUTEUW FOUNDATION FBO HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $1,065,000 · OtherUW FOUNDATION FBO HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTERFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $950,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERKINDERING CENTER: $685,000 · OtherKINDERING CENTERBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $465,000 · OtherBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INCRYTHER CHILD CENTER: $445,000 · OtherRYTHER CHILD CENTERSALVATION ARMY: $426,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYCHILDHAVEN: $290,000 · Other+42 more: $2,374,500 · Other+42 morePediatric Interim Care Center: $890,000 · HealthPediatric Interim Ca…OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $710,000 · HealthOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FO…OLIVE CREST: $325,000 · HealthOLIVE CRESTBoyer Children's Clinic: $225,000 · HealthBoyer Children's Cli…HEARING SPEECH AND DEAFNESS CENTER DBA HEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER: $125,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF FSH RESEARCH: $95,000 · Health+4 more: $84,500 · HealthBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $415,000 · EducationBOARD OF TRUST…EASTSIDE ACADEMY: $315,000 · EducationEASTSIDE ACADE…College Success Foundation: $305,000 · EducationCollege Succes…Pacific Lutheran University: $200,000 · EducationPacific Luther…INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON: $185,000 · EducationINDEPENDENT CO…HERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $172,500 · EducationHERITAGE UNIVE…NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS: $140,000 · EducationNORTHWEST EDUC…+3 more: $51,000 · EducationEVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $407,000 · Human ServicesAMARA: $350,000 · Human ServicesBrightspark Early Learning Services: $78,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $50,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINK: $37,500 · Human Services+5 more: $27,500 · Human ServicesTREEHOUSE: $156,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP KOREY: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $122,500 · Recreation & SportsOutdoors for all Foundation: $28,000 · Recreation & SportsPEACE COMMUNITY CENTER: $22,500 · Recreation & SportsASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $40,000 · Philanthropy
Other$7,976,000Health$2,454,500Education$1,783,500Human Services$950,000Youth Development$306,000Recreation & Sports$173,000Philanthropy$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $950,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPediatric Interim Care Center: $890,000 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $710,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetKINDERING CENTER: $685,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC: $465,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $415,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION: $407,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetAMARA: $350,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $325,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEASTSIDE ACADEMY: $315,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetCollege Success Foundation: $305,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDHAVEN: $290,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBoyer Children's Clinic: $225,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTUCKER MAXON SCHOOL: $225,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON: $185,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY: $172,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $156,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP KOREY: $150,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS: $140,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHEARING SPEECH AND DEAFNESS CENTER DBA HEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER: $125,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $122,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF FSH RESEARCH: $95,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetBrightspark Early Learning Services: $78,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE: $40,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK: $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCush It To The Limit: $30,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $28,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 51% of budgetEASTSIDE HERITAGE CENTER: $25,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetPEACE COMMUNITY CENTER: $22,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Eastside Services: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY LAW CASA OF KING COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetR MERLE PALMER MINORITY SCHOLARSHIP: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Pathways: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE ART MUSEUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetORCA CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COFFEE OASIS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Pediatric Interim Care Center ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREENHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMARA ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds College Success Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
  • Who funds Boyer Children's Clinic ↗
  • Who funds TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT COLLEGES OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CAMP KOREY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST EDUCATION ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds HEARING SPEECH AND DEAFNESS CENTER DBA HEARING SPEECH AND DEAF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FSH RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Brightspark Early Learning Services ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE46.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Medina Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · NW Childrens Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · Lucky Seven Foundation · Elizabeth a Lynn Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anderson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anderson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anderson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Anderson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anderson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph