Skip to content
Anchorage Lodge No 1534 Loyal Order of Moose at a glance

· Public charity

Anchorage Lodge No 1534 Loyal Order of Moose

To care for the young and elderly, bring the community closer together through charitable work, provide support to the ill and indigent as well as provide for members in need.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$143kHousing & Shelter$85kHealth$64kYouth Development$58kFood & Nutrition$25kReligion$5kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $15,486, the rows itemized in this filing. The $18,784 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,298 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,321
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOOSE CHARITIES$10,321
VARIOUS CHARITIES 5000 EACH$5,165
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%KUPAIANAHA CHURCH: $5k → 9%ALASKA RUSH SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 10%WOMEN OF THE MOOSE: $11k → 22%MOOSE CHARITIES: $22k → 8%VARIOUS CHARITIES 5000 EACH: $27k → 10%WOMEN OF THE MOOSE: $6k → 22%MOOSE CHARITIES: $12k → 8%CHILDREN'S LUNCHBOX: $25k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $11k → 8%VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH: $19k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $11k → 8%VARIOUS CHARITIES 1700 EACH: $19k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $11k → 8%VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH: $18k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $10k → 8%VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH: $16k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $7k → 8%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - ANCHOR: $16k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $7k → 8%VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH: $15k → 10%MOOSE CHARITIES: $5k → 8%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - ANCHOR: $15k → 10%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $14k → 10%VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH: $13k → 10%VARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 2000 EACH: $11k → 10%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION - ANCHOR: $10k → 10%VARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 2000 EACH: $10k → 10%VARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 5000 EACH: $10k → 10%VARIOUS YOUTH ACTIVITY PROGRAMS: $9k → 10%VARIOUS CHARITIES 5000 EACH: $5k → 10%ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESOURCE AGENCY: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 6 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$304k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+4%

Still filing today

33%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOOSE CHARITIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +74%
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH
    5× · 2018–2022 · $82k
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $56k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • BC
    Beans Cafe Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES 1700 EACH
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • VY
    VARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 5000 EACH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACH: $82,031 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIES 2000 EACHVARIOUS CHARITIES 5000 EACH: $31,787 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIES 5000 EACHVARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 2000 EACH: $21,295 · OtherVARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 2000 EACHVARIOUS CHARITIES 1700 EACH: $18,881 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIES 1700 EACHFREE & ACCEPTED MASONS OF OHIO: $17,562 · OtherFREE & ACCEPTED MASONS OF OHIOVARIOUS YOUTH PROGRAMS 5000 EACH: $10,344 · OtherVARIOUS YOUTH ACTIVITY PROGRAMS: $8,580 · OtherAlzheimers Disease Resource Agency of Alaska: $8,000 · Other+2 more: $10,875 · OtherMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $95,645 · PhilanthropyMOOSE CHARITIES INCCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $55,729 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS …Beans Cafe Inc: $24,851 · Housing & Shelter
Other$209,355Philanthropy$95,645Health$55,729Housing & Shelter$24,851

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $95,645 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $55,729 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBeans Cafe Inc: $24,851 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAlzheimers Disease Resource Agency of Alaska: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOOSE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Beans Cafe Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alzheimers Disease Resource Agency of Alaska ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anchorage Lodge No 1534 Loyal Order of Moose funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anchorage Lodge No 1534 Loyal Order of Moose. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anchorage Lodge No 1534 Loyal Order of Moose’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home