· Private foundation
Amory Outreach Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $109k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $77k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ITAWAMBA COMMUNITY COLLEGE B S U | $20,200 |
| MISSISSIPPI FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN | $15,000 |
| ABUNDANT LIFE ADULT ACTIVITY CENTER | $12,000 |
| BLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| AMORY FOOD PANTRY INC | $10,000 |
| HEALING HORSES RANCH INC | $10,000 |
| MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY BSU | $8,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI BSU | $8,000 |
| GREATER EUROPE MISSION | $5,000 |
| THE BAPTIST CHILDREN'S VILLAGE | $5,000 |
| BILL MONAGHAN MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| ITAWAMBA CROSSROADS RANCH | $5,000 |
| IGLESIA BAUTISTA DE CENTER POINT | $5,000 |
| HISPANOLA MOUNTAIN MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATI | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $194k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES7× · 2017–2023 · $108k · revenue +120%
- BMBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY8× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +76%
- FCFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY8× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- ICIMAGE COVENANT MINISTRIESone grant, 2017 · $18k
- UYUSA YOUTH OUTREACHone grant, 2018 · $8k
- HAHANDS AT WORK IN AFRICA USAone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
The organizations exempt purpose is to rescue orphans and widows, feed the poor, build the local church through ministry, crusades and outreaches and to win souls around the world.
For his glory's mission is to launch disciple-making movements that transform nations for christ.
Purpose is sending individuals around the world to win souls to jesus christ by preaching the gospel evangelism.
Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.
To preach and propogate the gospel of jesus christ in the united states and throughout the world, to provide christian literature and training materials through various forms of media, and to offer christian leadership and discipleship…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commission to Every Nation and the most unlike its peers is Friend of God Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds AMORY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FIRST FRIENDS RESPITE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FATHERS IN THE FIELD ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE WORTH FINDING MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EQUIP INDIA INC ↗
- Who funds William Carey University ↗
- Who funds HISPANIOLA MOUNTAIN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 691 PUSHMATAHA AREA TRUST FUND ↗
- Who funds FRIEND OF GOD MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE MISSION THE CROSS ↗
- Who funds QUALITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ITAWAMBA CROSSROADS RANCH ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ergon Foundation Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Brevard Family Foundation · Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender Trustee · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Servant Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amory Outreach Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.