Skip to content
American Society of Radiologic Technologists at a glance

· Public charity

American Society of Radiologic Technologists

The mission of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS is to advance and elevate the medical imaging and radiation therapy profession and enhance the quality and safety of patient care.

$740k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$146kScience & Tech$140kEnvironment$51kCommunity Improvement$47kEducation$23k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $615,049, the rows itemized in this filing. The $740,334 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $125,285 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $119k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $126k
  • $250k+1 grant · $370k
$7,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$107M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASRT FOUNDATION$370,000
MN SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$47,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MED MOUNT SINAI$27,060
AMERICAN SOC FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY$25,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS - NEW MEXICO$15,000
CA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$12,063
FL SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$9,987
NY SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$9,387
THE UNIVERSITY OF NM FOUNDATION$9,000
TEXAS SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECH$7,589
PA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,220
OR SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,000
AZ SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,000
CT SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,000
ND SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS - NEW MEXICO: $36k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS - NEW MEXICO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 31 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
19

Total granted

$4.6M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

48%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASRT FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +16% · 37% of their budget
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY
    5× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +24%
  • CS
    California Society of Radiologic Technologists
    5× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY
    one grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue +11%
  • PE
    PHILLIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Radiological Society Foundation
Health
2
The Radiosurgery Society

The Radiosurgery Society is a multi-disciplinary non-profit organization, consisting of surgeons, radiation oncologists, physicists, and allied health professionals, who are dedicated to advancing the science and clinical practice of SRS,…

Community Improvement
3
North American Society of Laser Therapy Applications

Research and Education

Health
4
International Society of Radiology

The principal function of the society is to support education efforts for radiologists, physicists, technologists, and other radiation workers. The society is also concerned with radiation protection of patients and workers and with…

—
5
Illinois Radiological Society

Education on radiology

—
6
American Roentgen Ray Society

The mission of the society is to advance medicine through the science of radiology and its allied sciences by enabling the creation and exchange of knowledge and information in the field through its journal, meetings and other means.

Health
7
Hawaii Radiological Society

To educate members to further their knowledge in the medical field of radiology.

Community Improvement
8
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
9
Missouri Radiological Society

Mission is to update membership on new federal regulations, keep membership current on ocn laws and make members aware of current legislation that affects health care industry.

—
10
Massachusetts Radiological Society Inc

Educational meetings

—
11
American Society of Spine Radiology

To advance the knowledge and development of spine radiology.

Health
12
Texas Radiological Society a Chapter

The mission of the texas radiological society, as a chapter of the american college of radiology, is to serve, promote and advance the profession of radiology in texas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society of Radiologic Technologists; the most unlike its peers is Florida Society of Radiologic Technologists inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASRT FOUNDATION: $3,545,200 · HealthASRT FOUNDATION+4 more: $61,350 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY: $175,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RA…American Red Cross: $115,000 · OtherAmerican Red CrossCalifornia Society of Radiologic Technologists: $60,225 · OtherCalifornia Society of R…Minnesota Society of Radiologic Technologists: $53,500 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $46,372 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $43,452 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADILOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $35,015 · Other+36 more: $490,551 · Other+36 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationNATIONAL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION & MEASUREMENTS: $50,000 · EnvironmentThe Ohio Society of Radiologic Technologist Education and Research Foundati: $6,688 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45,675 · Human ServicesNEBRASKA SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $13,996 · Community Improvement
Health$3,606,550Other$1,019,115Education$92,000Environment$56,688Human Services$45,675Community Improvement$13,996

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASRT FOUNDATION: $3,545,200 over 9y, 37% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY: $175,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCalifornia Society of Radiologic Technologists: $60,225 over 5y, 20% of budgetMinnesota Society of Radiologic Technologists: $53,500 over 2y, 54% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION & MEASUREMENTS: $50,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $46,372 over 5y, 12% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $45,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADILOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $35,015 over 5y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES: $33,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $32,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOSRT Business Association: $25,710 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS INC: $25,073 over 4y, 29% of budgetAmerican Society of Radiologic Technologists Utah Society: $20,775 over 3y, 78% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $14,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetNEBRASKA SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $13,996 over 2y, 17% of budgetJOINT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION IN RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY: $13,850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC WISCONSIN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TEC: $10,822 over 2y, 35% of budgetSOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLA SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECH: $7,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Ohio Society of Radiologic Technologist Education and Research Foundati: $6,688 over 1y, 61% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS: $5,222 over 1y, 77% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Society of Radiologic Technologists funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • National Council On Radiation Protection & Measurements: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Society of Radiologic Technologists’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home