Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

American Society of Radiologic Technologists

The mission of the AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS is to advance and elevate the medical imaging and radiation therapy profession and enhance the quality and safety of patient care.

$698k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$3.2MEducation$56kEnvironment$51kHuman Services$46kCommunity Improvement$14kOther$822k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $569,967 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $697,767 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $127,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $99k
  • $250k+1 grant · $370k
$7,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$100M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASRT FOUNDATION$370,000
AMERICAN SOC FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY$25,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MED MOUNT SINAI$22,940
AMERICAN RED CROSS - NEW MEXICO$15,000
JRCERT$13,850
CA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$11,999
NTL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION$10,000
NY SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$9,493
PA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$9,492
THE UNIVERSITY OF NM FOUNDATION$8,000
ATLANTA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECH$7,500
MA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,214
ANGIOCALCX-RAY RISK$7,200
GA SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,000
AL SOC OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS - NEW MEXICO: $36k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS - NEW MEXICO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 26 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$4.0M
$188k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY
    4× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +14%
  • CS
    California Society of Radiologic Technologists
    4× · 2021–2024 · $48k · revenue +47%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2017–2018 · $46k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY
    one grant, 2023 · $32k · revenue +11%
  • PE
    PHILLIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Radiological Society Foundation
Health
2
The Radiosurgery Society

The Radiosurgery Society is a multi-disciplinary non-profit organization, consisting of surgeons, radiation oncologists, physicists, and allied health professionals, who are dedicated to advancing the science and clinical practice of SRS,…

Community Improvement
3
North American Society of Laser Therapy Applications

Research and Education

Health
4
Illinois Radiological Society

Education on radiology

—
5
International Society of Radiology

The principal function of the society is to support education efforts for radiologists, physicists, technologists, and other radiation workers. The society is also concerned with radiation protection of patients and workers and with…

—
6
American Roentgen Ray Society

The mission of the society is to advance medicine through the science of radiology and its allied sciences by enabling the creation and exchange of knowledge and information in the field through its journal, meetings and other means.

Health
7
Hawaii Radiological Society

To educate members to further their knowledge in the medical field of radiology.

Community Improvement
8
Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound

The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) is a professional medical organization dedicated to furthering the advancement of the science, practice, and continued education of the specialty of ultrasound radiology.

—
9
American Society of Spine Radiology

To advance the knowledge and development of spine radiology.

Health
10
Massachusetts Radiological Society Inc

Educational meetings

—
11
Missouri Radiological Society

Mission is to update membership on new federal regulations, keep membership current on ocn laws and make members aware of current legislation that affects health care industry.

—
12
Texas Radiological Society a Chapter

The mission of the texas radiological society, as a chapter of the american college of radiology, is to serve, promote and advance the profession of radiology in texas.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society of Radiologic Technologists and the most unlike its peers is American Society of Association Executives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 59 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr18%72%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr16%82%35–55yr18%17%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/50
the rest of the field
12%
1,111/9,590

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASRT FOUNDATION — $3,175,200 · HealthASRT FOUNDATION+3 more — $55,850 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY — $150,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR R…American Red Cross — $100,000 · OtherAmerican Red CrossCalifornia Society of Radiologic Technologists — $48,162 · OtherCalifornia Society of …AMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $36,985 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $36,232 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES — $33,500 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADILOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $29,146 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLISTS — $28,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $27,610 · Other+30 more — $331,991 · Other+30 moreICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $22,940 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationNATIONAL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION & MEASUREMENTS — $44,000 · EnvironmentThe Ohio Society of Radiologic Technologist Education and Research Foundati — $6,688 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $45,675 · Human ServicesNEBRASKA SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $13,996 · Community Improvement
Health$3,231,050Other$821,626Education$55,940Environment$50,688Human Services$45,675Community Improvement$13,996

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASRT FOUNDATION — $3,175,200 over 8y, 37% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY — $150,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCalifornia Society of Radiologic Technologists — $48,162 over 4y, 20% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $45,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION & MEASUREMENTS — $44,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $36,985 over 4y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES — $33,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY — $32,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADILOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $29,146 over 4y, 13% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $22,940 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS INC — $19,804 over 3y, 29% of budgetOSRT Business Association — $19,564 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Society of Radiologic Technologists Utah Society — $13,999 over 2y, 78% of budgetNEBRASKA SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $13,996 over 2y, 17% of budgetJOINT REVIEW COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION IN RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY — $13,850 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC WISCONSIN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TEC — $10,822 over 2y, 35% of budgetSOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLA SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $7,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECH — $7,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe Ohio Society of Radiologic Technologist Education and Research Foundati — $6,688 over 1y, 61% of budgetMinnesota Society of Radiologic Technologists — $6,500 over 1y, 24% of budgetNEW JERSEY SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS — $5,222 over 1y, 77% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Society of Radiologic Technologists funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • National Council On Radiation Protection & Measurements — 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines