Skip to content

· Public charity

American Society of Interior Designers Foundation

The foundation provides grants and scholarships for the collection, expansion, and dissemination of an interior design evidence-based body of knowledge, and scholarships that recognize prospective and current contributions to the interior design profession.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$341kEducation$150kArts & Culture$120kHuman Services$40kHousing & Shelter$13k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $99,547, the rows itemized in this filing. The $253,352 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $153,805 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $94k
$14,297
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$25,000
CENTER FOR ADVANCED DESIGN RESEARCH$20,000
BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE$15,000
FL INTERNATIONAL UNIV$14,297
PERKINS & WILL$10,000
CADREHKS$10,000
NY SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN$5,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CENTER FOR ADVANCED DESIGN RESEARCH: $20k → 6%CENTER FOR ADVANCED DESIGN RESEARCH & EVALUATION: $40k → 16%CADREHKS: $10k → 6%CENTER FOR ADVANCED DESIGN RESEARCH: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$563k · 11 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$563k
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+45%

Still filing today

45%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM
    4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +76%
  • WC
    WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +31%
  • BA
    BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERIOR DESIGNERS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR ACTIVE DESIGN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Art Center College of Design

Our mission is to educate, inspire, and empower creative and design leaders.

Education
2
Center for Arts Design and Social Research Incorporated

The center for arts, design and social research is a private, nonprofit institution of higher education that provides instruction in and conducts research on the relationship of art and design to global societies. the center offers…

Education
3
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
4
The School of Architecture

Building on frank lloyd wright's designs and thoughts, the school is a graduate program in architecture that teaches and practices learning by doing, new ways of looking, an ability to honor and build with the landscape, and…

Education
5
American Institute of Architects Los Angeles Chapter

Providing leadership in improving the building environment

—
6
Rhode Island School of Design

The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…

Education
7
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
Council for Interior Design Accredi

Establishing and administering a voluntary plan for the specialized accreditation of interior design education offered at institutions of higher learning

Education
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
The American Institute of Architects

Vision: drive positive change through the power of design and focused activism.mission: aia inspires and empowers architects to improve society and transform the world.

—
12
Otis College of Art and Design

Otis prepares diverse students of art and design to enrich our world through their creativity, their skill, and their vision.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York School of Interior Design; the most unlike its peers is National Building Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASHKS INC: $70,000 · OtherHKS INCPERKINS & WILL: $47,000 · OtherPERKINS & WILLBOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE: $30,000 · OtherBOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGEVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $23,047 · OtherFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYAMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERIOR DESIGNERS: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERIOR DESIGNERSCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $13,750 · OtherPUBLIC DESIGN STUDIO: $12,500 · Other+3 more: $26,750 · Other+3 moreWESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationWESTERN CAROLINA UNI…FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $28,750 · EducationFLORIDA INTERNATIONA…CENTER FOR ACTIVE DESIGN INC: $15,500 · EducationCENTER FOR ACTIVE DE…NEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN: $5,250 · EducationNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $100,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL BUILDING…Center For Advanced Design Research And Evaluation: $80,000 · Human ServicesCenter For Ad…
Other$363,047Education$119,500Arts & Culture$100,000Human Services$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $100,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCenter For Advanced Design Research And Evaluation: $80,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetWESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $28,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERIOR DESIGNERS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTIVE DESIGN INC: $15,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPUBLIC DESIGN STUDIO: $12,500 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetNEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Center For Advanced Design Research And Evaluation ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON ARCHITECTURAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERIOR DESIGNERS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTIVE DESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC DESIGN STUDIO ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Society of Interior Designers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Society of Interior Designers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Boston Architectural College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $59k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Society of Interior Designers’ filings →

More from the funding graph