· Public charity
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Research and Education Fdtn
Our mission: support ashp by advancing the professional practice of pharmacists and the pharmacy workforce by funding research and education that improves health outcomes through optimal, safe, and effective medication use.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 15 grants below total $696,590 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $730,281 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $33,691 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k13 grants · $269k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
- $250k+1 grant · $353k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS | $352,620 |
| VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY | $74,820 |
| MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC | $37,290 |
| BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC | $36,861 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM | $30,000 |
| STATE OF MARYLAND | $29,999 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO HOSPITAL AUTHORITY | $25,000 |
| COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| SOUTH UNIVERSITY RESEARCH II LLC | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR SUNY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $267k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +44%
- UOUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation3× · 2019–2024 · $94k · revenue +45%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH3× · 2022–2024 · $85k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASOone grant, 2018 · $50k
- CHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +53%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALSone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.
Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…
Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…
To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…
Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…
Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.
We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS (ASHP) ↗
- Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education ↗
- Who funds MEDSTAR HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds DENT NEUROSCIENCES RESEARCH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Midlands ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BayCare Health System Inc ↗
- Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Rhode Island Hospital ↗
- Who funds ALBANY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds SAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Mayo Clinic · Reach Out and Read Inc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · Washington University · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Johns Hopkins University · Gamers Outreach Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Research and Education Fdtn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medstar Health Research Institute Inc — 25% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp) — 1% of income from government
- University of Maryland Medical System Corporation — 0% of income from government
- BayCare Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Johns Hopkins Hospital — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.