Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

American Society for Nondestructive Testing

Asnt exists to create a safer world by promoting the profession and technologies of nondestructive testing. Asnt provides a forum for exchange of ndt technical information; ndt educational materials and programs; standards and services for the qualification and certification of ndt personnel. Asnt promotes the discipline of ndt as a…

$150k
Granted FY2022
7
Itemized grants FY2022
7
Organizations funded FY2022
14%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$120k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 8
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
7
Total assets, FY2022
$55M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 14% of the organizations American Society for Nondestructive Testing funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EducationScience & TechHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20227$120k14%
FY20216$120k67%
FY20207$120k43%
FY20198$130k63%
FY20186$110k100%
FY20177$115kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Science & Tech$440kEducation$275k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
UT
MO
VA
MD
NM
AL
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Iowa State University$90,0004n/a
Southern Illinois University- Carbondale$65,0004n/a
Michigan State University$60,0002n/a
Pennsylvania State University$50,0003n/a
New Mexico State University$40,0002n/a
University of Maryland College Park$40,0002n/a
University of Pittsburgh$40,00020%
Georgia Southern University Research and Service Foundationinc$30,00020%
Michigan State Univ$25,0001n/a
New York University$25,00020%
Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of American Society for Nondestructive Testing by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Iowa State University$90,0004n/a
Southern Illinois University- Carbondale$65,0004n/a
Michigan State University$60,0002n/a
Pennsylvania State University$50,0003n/a
New Mexico State University$40,0002n/a
University of Maryland College Park$40,0002n/a
University of Pittsburgh$40,00020%
Georgia Southern University Research and Service Foundationinc$30,00020%
Michigan State Univ$25,0001n/a
New York University$25,00020%
Curators of the University of Missouri$20,0001n/a
Portland State University$20,0001n/a
University of Texas$20,0001n/a
Brigham Young University$20,0001n/a
Drexel University$20,00010%
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois$20,0001n/a
Georgia Institute of Technology$20,0001n/a
Georgia Tech Research Corporation$20,00010%
Texas A&M University-Commerce$20,0001n/a
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University$20,0001n/a
University of Utah$10,0001n/a
Regents of the University of Idaho$10,0002n/a
University of Massachusetts$10,0001n/a
Nj Institute of Technology$10,0001n/a
Ohio Northern University$5,00010%
University of Alabama at Birmingham$5,0001n/a

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Tulsa Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare American Society for Nondestructive Testing with peer funders

About American Society for Nondestructive Testing

How much does American Society for Nondestructive Testing give?
American Society for Nondestructive Testing reported 7 itemized grants totaling $120,000, out of $150,082 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 8 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does American Society for Nondestructive Testing fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Science & Tech (62%), Education (38%).
Who are American Society for Nondestructive Testing's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Iowa State University ($90k), Southern Illinois University- Carbondale ($65k), Michigan State University ($60k).
Does American Society for Nondestructive Testing fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as American Society for Nondestructive Testing?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Folds of Honor Foundation, American Chemical Society, Tulsa Community Foundation.
Where is American Society for Nondestructive Testing based?
American Society for Nondestructive Testing is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $15k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Society for Nondestructive Testing’s filings →

More from the funding graph