Skip to content

· Private foundation

American Slavic Association Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Health$145kEducation$118kHuman Services$33kArts & Culture$32kMembership Benefit$25kReligion$15kScience & Tech$6kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$660k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Sava Serbian Orthodox Church$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%Arizona Trail Association: $2k → 15%Globe-Miami Serbian Cemetery Assn: $13k → 19%Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyff: $3k → 7%Xitlali Naegele Ramirez: $2k → 12%Pirate Clark: $2k → 8%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%Globe-Miami Serbian Cemetary Assoc: $10k → 19%Tesla Science Center at Wardenclyff: $3k → 7%HONOR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%Serbian Cemetary: $7k → 19%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%Globe-Miami Serbian Cemetery Assn: $7k → 19%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%Serbian Cemetary: $7k → 19%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%Globe Miami Serbian Cemetery Assn: $5k → 19%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%SLAVIC CULTURAL CENTER: $3k → 19%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%Honor Health Foundation: $15k → 11%VARIOUS ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $3k → 11%Naomi Battaglia: $2k → 11%Caleb Alexander: $2k → 11%THE BARROWS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%THE BARROWS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%Mitchell Kasovac: $2k → 11%Preston Kasovac: $2k → 11%Cash Monroe: $2k → 11%Mana House Catholic Charities: $2k → 11%Colleens Dream Foundation: $3k → 11%Arizona Humanities: $3k → 11%Rain Brooks: $2k → 11%Dimitrios Zistatsis: $2k → 11%St Sava Serbian Orthodox Church: $5k → 11%St Sava Serbian Orthodox Church: $5k → 11%St Sava Serbian Orthodox Church: $5k → 11%ST SAVA SNF GOLF: $100 → 11%Jaden Bennett: $2k → 11%Milan Djurdjevic: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
OR
OH
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$293k · 28 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 21 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
42

Total granted

$293k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+57%

Still filing today

4%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +31%
  • TB
    THE BARROWS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k
  • GS
    GLOBE-MIAMI SERBIAN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k

Funded once

  • GS
    Globe-Miami Serbian Cemetary Assoc
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SC
    SLAVIC CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BARROWS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherTHE BARROWS FOUNDATIONGLOBE-MIAMI SERBIAN CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherGLOBE-MIAMI SERBIAN CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONST SAVA SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherST SAVA SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGlobe-Miami Serbian Cemetary Assoc: $10,000 · Other+65 more: $135,700 · Other+65 moreHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $140,000 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATIONSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesARIZONA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureARIZONA TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $2,376 · Public Benefit
Other$229,700Health$140,000Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$2,500Public Benefit$2,376

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEEN'S DREAM FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARIZONA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetARIZONA TRAIL ASSOCIATION: $2,376 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HONORHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLLEEN'S DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA TRAIL ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Slavic Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Slavic Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Slavic Association Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Slavic Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Slavic Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph