Loading…
· Public charity
AMERICAN PROPERTY OWNERS ALLIANCE
To promote social welfare within the meaning of section 501c4 of the (continued on schedule o)internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, or the corresponding provision of any future united states internal revenue law, including but not limited to, advancing and promoting issues of concern to property owners throughout america.
$1.7M
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
6
Communities
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Community Improvement$3.0MHuman Services$2.5MPublic Benefit$2.0MEducation$80kOther$940k
02FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k3 grants · $210k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$500,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD$500,000
- NEW HEIGHTS FOR AMERICA$500,000
- ONE NATION$500,000
- FINANCIAL FOUNDATIONS UNIVERSITY LLC$70,000
- DOUGLAS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$70,000
- NATIONAL BLACK EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL INC$70,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.7M · 5 repeat orgs$855k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
6
Total granted
$7.7M
$285k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+117%
+5%
Still filing today
100%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $570k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ONONE NATION2× · 2021–2022 · $3.0M · revenue +1078%
- AAAMERICAN ACTION NETWORK2× · 2021–2022 · $2.5M · revenue +56%
- ONONE NATION3× · 2021–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +117%
Funded once
- OMOPPORTUNITY MATTERS NETWORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +65%
- AUAMERICAN UNITY FUNDone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -34%
- NTNATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNIONone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
American Policy Coalition
With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.
Public Benefit
2
The National Foundation for
The national foundation for americn policy is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to public policy research on trade, immigration, and other issues of national importance. the organization seeks to expand the debate over the…
Public Benefit
3
RepresentUs
RepresentUs is America's leading nonpartisan grassroots organization working for a government accountable to the people. We unite people from all backgrounds to defend democracy, root out corruption, mobilize action, and support campaigns…
Public Benefit
4
America Engaged
America Engaged is a public policy organization, dedicated to promoting the Constitution of the United States and its core structural features.
—
5
American Prosperity Alliance
American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.
—
6
American Voice
American Voice's mission is to create a more prosperous, fair and free
—
7
American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce
The American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce has emerged as a firewall against government overreach and a beacon for common sense. We advocate for policies that will extend rather than extinguish the American experiment and ensure that…
Community Improvement
8
Council for National Policy
To provide information about policy alternatives.
Public Benefit
9
Oklahoma United for Progress Inc
OKUnited is a bipartisan grassroots advocacy movement formed to educate and advocate for improved civic engagement, and to take actions that encourage and produce better voter participation, representation, choices, and nonpartisan…
—
10
Advancing American Freedom Inc
Advancing american freedom (aaf) is a 501(c)(4) organization advocating for conservative values and policy proposals by means of policy conferences, the development of the freedom agenda, coalition meetings, and amicus briefs filed with…
International
11
No Labels
No Labels is a movement of Democrats, Republicans, and everything in between, dedicated to the politics of problem solving. We stand united behind a simple proposition: We want our government to stop fighting and start fixing.
—
12
Center for Freedom and Prosperity
To promote economic prosperity by advocating for competitive markets and limited government. (See Schedule O)
Public Benefit
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Taxpayers Union and the most unlike its peers is The Suburban Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Community Improvement$3,025,000Human Services$2,500,000Public Benefit$2,000,000Other$940,000Education$80,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONE NATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ONE NATION ↗
- Who funds NEW HEIGHTS FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK EMPOWERMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY MATTERS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds DOUGLAS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOR TAX REFORM ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR A FREE ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds THE SUBURBAN PROJECT ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation AMERICAN PROPERTY OWNERS ALLIANCE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OPPORTUNITY MATTERS NETWORK INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +65% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 861750249 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on OPPORTUNITY MATTERS NETWORK INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to American Property Owners Alliance?
Find your warmest path to American Property Owners Alliance through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines