Skip to content

· Public charity

American Platform Tennis Associationinc

To govern, grow participation and improve all aspects of the game of platform tennis.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$347kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT NY$40,000
HOP BROOK TENNIS CLUB$20,000
CITY OF SUMMIT (WILSON PARK) (NJ)$20,000
CONESTOGA SWIM CLUB$10,000
GLENDALE LYCEUM$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25k → 7%CAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25k → 10%CONESTOGA SWIM CLUB: $10k → 10%GRANTSLOANS - MLPTA: $11k → 11%VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT NY: $40k → 9%SHADOW LAKE ROCHESTER PLATFORM TENNIS LLC: $15k → 14%ROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $15k → 9%HOP BROOK TENNIS CLUB: $20k → 11%FRIENDS OF BITSY GRANT: $109k → 13%GLENDALE LYCEUM: $7k → 16%CLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%LINCOLNSHIRE TENNIS MANAGEMENT (LIFE SPORT): $10k → 8%WILMETTE PARK DISTRICT: $20k → 14%PARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB: $15k → 4%CITY OF SUMMIT (WILSON PARK) (NJ): $20k → 10%BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Winnetka Platform Tennis Club Inc

This is a platform tennis sport and social club

Recreation & Sports
2
Crossroads Tennis Association
—
3
American Platform Tennis Associationinc

To govern, grow participation and improve all aspects of the game of platform tennis.

Recreation & Sports
4
Metropolitan Area Platform Tennis Association

Mapta is a non-profit organization dedicated to growing the sport of platform tennis in the greater philadelphia and wilmington metropolitan areas. we provide our members with quality programs and events in an organized environment that…

Recreation & Sports
5
Central Range Pickleball Club
Recreation & Sports
6
Thompson Falls Pickleball Club
—
7
Professional Tennis Registry

To educate, certify, and service tennis teaching professionals and coaches around the world in order to grow the game.

—
8
Manker Patten Tennis Club Inc

To operate tennis club.

—
9
Siouxland Pickleball Association

Promote the sport of pickleball in the Siouxland area. Provide members places to play, equipment and instruction in the sport. Hold tournaments, leagues, and clinics.

Recreation & Sports
10
Newport Hills Swim & Tennis Club

Year Round Recreational Facility.

—
11
Indoor Tennis Club

Operation of private tennis courts

—
12
Patrick W Ryan Memorial Tennis Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rowayton Platform Tennis Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conestoga Swim Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF BITSY GRANT: $108,641 · OtherFRIENDS OF BITSY GRANTIndividual grant recipient: $57,004 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVILLAGE OF LARCHMONT: $40,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF LARCHMONTNEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25,000 · OtherNEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INCCITY OF SUMMIT: $20,000 · OtherWILMETTE PARK DISTRICT: $20,000 · OtherHOP BROOK TENNIS CLUB INC: $20,000 · OtherPARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB: $15,000 · OtherBOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR: $15,000 · OtherGRANTSLOANS - POND VIEW RACQUET CL: $15,000 · OtherSHADOW LAKE ROCHESTER PLATFORM TENNIS LLC: $15,000 · OtherPICKET POST SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB INC: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $47,800 · Other+5 moreCLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS …CAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS C…ROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS A…North Park Paddle Tennis Association: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNorth Park Paddle Tennis A…
Other$413,445Recreation & Sports$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetNEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetPARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB: $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPICKET POST SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNorth Park Paddle Tennis Association: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds ROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PICKET POST SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Conestoga Swim Club ↗
  • Who funds North Park Paddle Tennis Association ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Platform Tennis Associationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Platform Tennis Associationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Platform Tennis Associationinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph