Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Platform Tennis Associationinc

To govern, grow participation and improve all aspects of the game of platform tennis.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$347kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT NY$40,000
HOP BROOK TENNIS CLUB$20,000
CITY OF SUMMIT (WILSON PARK) (NJ)$20,000
CONESTOGA SWIM CLUB$10,000
GLENDALE LYCEUM$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25k → 7%CAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC: $25k → 10%CONESTOGA SWIM CLUB: $10k → 10%GRANTSLOANS - MLPTA: $11k → 11%VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT NY: $40k → 9%SHADOW LAKE ROCHESTER PLATFORM TENNIS LLC: $15k → 14%ROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC: $15k → 9%HOP BROOK TENNIS CLUB: $20k → 11%FRIENDS OF BITSY GRANT: $109k → 13%GLENDALE LYCEUM: $7k → 16%CLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%LINCOLNSHIRE TENNIS MANAGEMENT (LIFE SPORT): $10k → 8%WILMETTE PARK DISTRICT: $20k → 14%PARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB: $15k → 4%CITY OF SUMMIT (WILSON PARK) (NJ): $20k → 10%BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Winnetka Platform Tennis Club Inc

This is a platform tennis sport and social club

Recreation & Sports
2
Crossroads Tennis Association
3
American Platform Tennis Associationinc

To govern, grow participation and improve all aspects of the game of platform tennis.

Recreation & Sports
4
Metropolitan Area Platform Tennis Association

Mapta is a non-profit organization dedicated to growing the sport of platform tennis in the greater philadelphia and wilmington metropolitan areas. we provide our members with quality programs and events in an organized environment that…

Recreation & Sports
5
Central Range Pickleball Club
Recreation & Sports
6
Thompson Falls Pickleball Club
7
Professional Tennis Registry

To educate, certify, and service tennis teaching professionals and coaches around the world in order to grow the game.

8
Manker Patten Tennis Club Inc

To operate tennis club.

9
Siouxland Pickleball Association

Promote the sport of pickleball in the Siouxland area. Provide members places to play, equipment and instruction in the sport. Hold tournaments, leagues, and clinics.

Recreation & Sports
10
Newport Hills Swim & Tennis Club

Year Round Recreational Facility.

11
Indoor Tennis Club

Operation of private tennis courts

12
Patrick W Ryan Memorial Tennis Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rowayton Platform Tennis Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Conestoga Swim Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF BITSY GRANT — $108,641 · OtherFRIENDS OF BITSY GRANTIndividual grant recipient — $57,004 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVILLAGE OF LARCHMONT — $40,000 · OtherVILLAGE OF LARCHMONTNEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC — $25,000 · OtherNEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INCHOP BROOK TENNIS CLUB INC — $20,000 · OtherCITY OF SUMMIT — $20,000 · OtherWILMETTE PARK DISTRICT — $20,000 · OtherPARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB — $15,000 · OtherGRANTSLOANS - POND VIEW RACQUET CL — $15,000 · OtherSHADOW LAKE ROCHESTER PLATFORM TENNIS LLC — $15,000 · OtherBOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR — $15,000 · OtherPICKET POST SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB INC — $15,000 · Other+5 more — $47,800 · Other+5 moreCLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsCLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS …CAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsCAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS C…ROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS A…North Park Paddle Tennis Association — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNorth Park Paddle Tennis A…
Other$413,445Recreation & Sports$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetNEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC — $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC — $25,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetPARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB — $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPICKET POST SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNorth Park Paddle Tennis Association — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLEVELAND PLATFORM TENNIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEEDHAM PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC
  • Who funds CAPE ANN PLATFORM TENNIS CLUB INC
  • Who funds PARK LAKES TENNIS CLUB
  • Who funds ROWAYTON PLATFORM TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PICKET POST SWIM AND TENNIS CLUB INC
  • Who funds North Park Paddle Tennis Association
  • Who funds Conestoga Swim Club

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Platform Tennis Associationinc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph