· Public charity
American Physical Therapy Association
Building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to improve the health of society.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY RESEARCH | $500,000 |
| PHYSICAL THERAPY FUND | $65,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURG | $25,000 |
| MISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| APTA PRIVATE PRACTICE SECTION | $7,250 |
| KANSAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION | $7,250 |
| ARKANSAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION | $7,250 |
| MINNESOTA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
| APTA OF MASSACHUSETTS | $6,000 |
| CONNECTICUT PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 5% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +14%- APAMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +1%
- MCMINNESOTA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- TPTEXAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue 0%
- MTMOVE TOGETHER INCone grant, 2021 · $25k
- HOHEALTH OCCUPATIONS STUDENTS OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The colorado physical therapy association advances physical therapist practice delivery through innovation, collaboration, advocacy and service.
Building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to improve the health of society.
The mission of the american physical therapy association - north carolina (apta nc) is to improve the health, function and quality of life of individuals by representing, promoting and advancing the profession and best pracitce of physical…
To advance the physical therapy profession in the state of washington.
Our mission is to optimize the experience of aging by: promoting the value, quality, and accessibility of geriatric care; providing life-long learning and mentorship that promotes innovative person-centered care; building a passionate…
To advance occupational therapy practice, education, and research through standard-setting and advocacy on behalf of its members, the profession, and the public.
Promote health equity and value in healthcare through best practices in advocacy, leadership, and innovation.
Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…
Aapmr strives to advance the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation, promote excellence in physiatric practice, and acts as an advocate on public policy issues related to disability. it assists pm&r physicians in acquiring the…
To ensure the professional growth, personal excellence, and recognition of physician associates, and to support efforts to enable them to improve the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of patient-centered health care.
To protect the practice of private medicine, preserve freedom of choice for patients, and educate physicians and the general public.
Empowering scientists to understand life and improve health by advancing and communicating discoveries in physiology and medicine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Physical Therapy Association Private Practice Section and the most unlike its peers is Arlington Cty Police Charitable Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds PHYSICAL THERAPY FUND ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Alabama Physical Therapy Association Chapter of the APTA ↗
- Who funds HEALTH OCCUPATIONS STUDENTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON CTY POLICE CHARITABLE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Chapter of American Physical Therapy Association ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Move2Learn ↗
- Who funds APTA Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION MONTANA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF PELVIC HEALTH PHYSICAL THERAPY ↗
- Who funds APTA South Carolina A Chapter of The American Physical Therapy Assoc Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds OREGON PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION CHAPTER OF AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAP ↗
- Who funds IDAHO PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCITION INC AKA APTA IDAHO ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF ACUTE CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY INC ↗
- Who funds American Physical Therapy Association Private Practice Section ↗
- Who funds KANSAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES BONE & JOINT INITIATIVE NFP ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Physical Therapy Association of Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVES ↗
- Who funds American Physical Therapy Association Indiana Chapter ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Physical Therapy Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.