Skip to content

· Public charity

American Neuromuscular Foundation

The AMERICAN NEUROMUSCULAR FOUNDATION was established to improve the quality of care for people with disorders of skeletal muscle, neuromuscular function, and central and peripheral nervous systems through the promotion of research and education and advancing public understanding of the disorders.

$290k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$578kScience & Tech$457kEducation$13k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $239,482, the rows itemized in this filing. The $290,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,568 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA$50,000
THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$39,575
GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION$25,000
THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF$25,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANA$24,907
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $50k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%UCLA: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $35k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $38k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 21%DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 11%REHABILITATION INSITITUTE OF: $50k → 14%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $14k → 22%THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $38k → 21%DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $39k → 11%REHABILITATION INSITITUTE OF: $38k → 14%GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $25k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 9%UNIVERISTY OF ROCHESTER: $9k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 21%DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $31k → 11%REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO DBA SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB: $30k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $12k → 11%REHABILITATION INSITITUTE OF: $13k → 14%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $47k → 14%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $39k → 14%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $17k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
MO
VA
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$745k · 7 repeat orgs$203k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$745k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+11%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $133k · revenue +49%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    4× · 2020–2023 · $130k · revenue +27%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $113k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • VH
    VCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • NY
    New York University
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INCMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $91,609 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $75,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $50,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $39,575 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $25,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDIndiana University School of Medicine: $24,907 · OtherIndiana University School of Medicine+2 more: $26,146 · Other+2 moreRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $130,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of ChicagoMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $102,829 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INCMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICDUKE UNIVERSITY: $132,654 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $112,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYNew York University: $12,500 · Education
Other$432,237Health$332,829Education$282,654

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $132,654 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $130,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $112,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $102,829 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Neuromuscular Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Neuromuscular Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Neuromuscular’s filings →

More from the funding graph