Skip to content

· Public charity

American Legion Post 91 of New Salem

To uphold and defend the constitution of the united states of america; to maintain law and order; to foster and perpetuate a one hundred percent americanism; to preserve the memories and incidents of our associations in the great wars; to inculcate a sense of individual obligation to the community, state and nation; to combat the…

$862k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$409kPublic Benefit$307kPublic Safety & Disaster$301kEducation$295kHealth$118kCrime & Legal$78kCommunity Improvement$61kHuman Services$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $502,368, the rows itemized in this filing. The $861,697 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $359,329 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $337k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW SALEM SADDLE CLUB$83,000
NEW SALEM PARK DISTRICT$43,375
Individual grant recipient$33,500
NEW SALEM-ALMONT SCHOOL$27,087
MCLEAN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT$24,000
WING PUBLIC SCHOOLS$23,400
SURREY PUBLIC SCHOOL$23,000
SURREY HIGH SCHOOL$21,550
NEW SALEM CIVIC CLUB$20,129
NEWSALEM-ALMONT SCHOOL$20,000
AO1 FOUNDATION$16,000
MAX PUBLIC SCHOOL$12,000
Individual grant recipient$11,500
Individual grant recipient$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AO1 FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 23 repeat orgs$736k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +130% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
39

Total granted

$1.3M
$572k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+130%
-6%

Still filing today

13%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NEW SALEM CIVIC CLUB INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $278k · revenue +574%
  • NS
    NEW SALEM-ALMONT SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $224k
  • NS
    NEW SALEM PARK DISTRICT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $91k

Funded once

  • AO
    ALL OFTHER 5000 OR LESS
    one grant, 2020 · $98k
  • AO
    ALL OTHER DONATIONS 5000 OR LESS
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • TF
    TOWNER FIRE AMBULANCE AND RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -105% · 37% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wexford Volunteer Fire Company No 1 of Pine Township

To provide fire protection services to the community.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
West View Volunteer Fire Department

Community fire protection

—
3
Garretson Volunteer Fire Department

The Garretson Volunteer Fire Department serves the City of Garretson and surrounding communities in Eastern South Dakota. The Department is made up completely of volunteer fireman and is responsible for roughly 100 square miles within its…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
West Fargo Rural Fire Department

Fire Protection

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Waskom Volunteer Fire Department & Ems Services Inc

Firefighter & emergency medical services for the waskom, tx area.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Pickwick Fire and Rescue

Volunteer fire and rescue providing services to homer township and mutual aid support to richmond and dakota townships, and city of winona

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Devils Lake Rural Fire Dept Inc

Fire Department

—
8
New Centerville & Rural Volunteer Fire Company

Providing fire fighting services to the surrounding communities.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
The Waverly Volunteer Fire Company Inc

To provide Fire, Rescue, Medical and Emergency services to the community.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Nowata Volunteer Fire Department Inc
Public Safety & Disaster
11
Dickinson Area Chamber of Commerce

The dickinson area chamber of commerce will provide leadership to promote a progressive business environment.

—
12
Irvington Volunteer Fire Department

The corporation provides fire protection and rescue services for irvington, ne and surrounding areas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Towner Community Club; the most unlike its peers is Hairball Haven. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW SALEM CIVIC CLUB INC: $278,059 · OtherNEW SALEM CIVIC CLUB INCNEW SALEM-ALMONT SCHOOL: $223,804 · OtherNEW SALEM-ALMONT SCHOOLALL OFTHER 5000 OR LESS: $97,906 · OtherNEW SALEM PARK DISTRICT: $91,154 · OtherNEW SALEM SADDLE CLUB: $83,000 · OtherNEW SALEM FIRE DEPT: $67,000 · Other+61 more: $1,108,622 · Other+61 moreTOWNER FIRE AMBULANCE AND RESCUE INC: $50,000 · HealthBISMARCK CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthWEST RIVER HEALTH SERVICES: $10,000 · HealthWESTERN ND HONOR FLIGHT: $20,000 · Arts & CultureAO1 FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesHAIRBALL HAVEN: $8,000 · Animals
Other$1,949,545Health$74,000Arts & Culture$20,000Human Services$16,000Animals$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW SALEM CIVIC CLUB INC: $278,059 over 6y, 24% of budgetTOWNER FIRE AMBULANCE AND RESCUE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetCenter Community Club Inc: $49,059 over 5y, 54% of budgetWESTERN ND HONOR FLIGHT: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAO1 FOUNDATION INC: $16,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBISMARCK CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWEST RIVER HEALTH SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAIRBALL HAVEN: $8,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTOWNER COMMUNITY CLUB: $6,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW SALEM CIVIC CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWNER FIRE AMBULANCE AND RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Center Community Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ND HONOR FLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds AO1 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BISMARCK CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Legion Post 91 of New Salem funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Legion Post 91 of New Salem. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Legion Post 91 of New Salem’s filings →

    More from the funding graph