Skip to content

· Public charity

American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd

To support the American Legion programs for veterans, young people, and community.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$264k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$1.2MHuman Services$433kYouth Development$159kHealth$117kEducation$83kArts & Culture$20kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $850,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,058,856 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $208,238 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $380k
  • $250k+1 grant · $264k
$40,278
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLISTON PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT$263,670
VETERANS UNITED INC$200,000
WILLISTON BASIN SCHOOL DISTRICT #7$74,300
COYOTE CLAY TARGET LEAGUE$55,500
WILLISTON PARKS AND REC FOUNDATION$50,000
COYOTE WRESTLING CLUB$43,258
WILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERS$40,278
MILITARY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE$38,862
BRAS FOR A CAUSE$25,750
NORTH DAKOTA AMERICAN LEGION FOUNDATION$25,000
WILLIAMS COUNTY 4-H$14,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UPPER MISSOURI VALLEY FAIR$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%VETERANS UNITED INC: $200k → 8%VETERANS UNITED INC: $200k → 8%VETERANS UNITED INC: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 16 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +194% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$2.7M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+194%
+6%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $489k · revenue +84%
  • CC
    COYOTE CLAY TARGET LEAGUE INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $229k · revenue +305%
  • BF
    BRAS FOR A CAUSE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $137k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • HE
    HAGAN ELEMENTARY PTO
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · 28% of their budget
  • WS
    WILLISTON SEA LIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Warrior Club Inc

Support winona state university athletics

—
2
Mandan Baseball Club Inc

To operate baseball program for the benefit of youth and their families so they may enjoy growth through recreational and competitive baseball.

Youth Development
3
North Dakota Amateur Hockey Association

To provide opportunities for youth aged 6-19 to learn the sport of hockey and to develop their skills to the next level of play.

Recreation & Sports
4
Williston Lodge No 239 Loyal Order of Moose

This organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, & charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social & recreational activities for the members and their families, estimated to number 1400

—
5
Wahpeton Breckenridge Area Chamber

To promote the Wahpeton Breckenridge area through the enhancement of community growth and business development.

—
6
Stanley Volunteer Rural Fire Association

Provide fire protection to rural fire district in stanley nd area.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Minot Hockey Boosters Inc

To promote skating and hockey; to promote good sportsmanship; to promote a better understanding of hockey; to encourage participation, support and attendance at hockey games and events, particularly by the young people in minot, north…

Recreation & Sports
8
Wasilla Youth Soccer Association

To develop and promote soccer for youth of all ages in Wasilla Alaska

Recreation & Sports
9
Kodiak Kid Wrestling Club

Provide education and opportunities for local kids to participate in wrestling contests as a supplement to the local school distric activities.

Recreation & Sports
10
North Stars Youth Hockey Association Inc

The Corporation was formed and operates for the exclusive purpose of education, recreation, and management of a youth hockey program for Grafton, ND and the surrounding area.

Recreation & Sports
11
Wilmington Youth Soccer Association Inc

To educate, sponsor and encourage youth to participate in the game of soccer.

Recreation & Sports
12
Waunakee Youth Hockey Association Inc

To provide an organized program for local youth to participate in the sport of hockey.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Williston Downtowners Association; the most unlike its peers is Hagan Elementary Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLISTON PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT: $684,734 · OtherWILLISTON PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICTWILLISTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $205,352 · OtherWILLISTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSTHE AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT OF NORTH DAKOTA: $86,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT OF NORTH DAKOTAVETERANS RELIEF FUND: $52,500 · Other+14 more: $244,417 · Other+14 moreWILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $489,278 · Recreation & SportsWILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERSCOYOTE CLAY TARGET LEAGUE INC: $228,960 · Recreation & SportsCOYOTE CLAY TARGET LEAGUE INCCOYOTE WRESTLING CLUB INC: $106,658 · Recreation & SportsCOYOTE WRESTLING CLUB INCWilliston Basin Skating Club Inc: $33,500 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 moreVETERANS UNITED INC: $450,000 · Human ServicesVETERANS UNITED I…BRAS FOR A CAUSE: $137,300 · HealthWILLISTON PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Community ImprovementWILLISTON DOWNTOWNERS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementHAGAN ELEMENTARY PTO: $25,000 · EducationNORTH DAKOTA AMERICAN LEGION FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,273,003Recreation & Sports$908,396Human Services$450,000Health$137,300Community Improvement$65,000Education$25,000Public Benefit$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERS: $489,278 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetVETERANS UNITED INC: $450,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetCOYOTE CLAY TARGET LEAGUE INC: $228,960 over 5y, 10% of budgetBRAS FOR A CAUSE: $137,300 over 5y, 12% of budgetCOYOTE WRESTLING CLUB INC: $106,658 over 5y, 22% of budgetTHE AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT OF NORTH DAKOTA: $86,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetWILLISTON PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetWilliston Basin Skating Club Inc: $33,500 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetUPPER MISSOURI VALLEY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetHAGAN ELEMENTARY PTO: $25,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA AMERICAN LEGION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetWILLISTON SEA LIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetAmerican Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd: $15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetWILLISTON COYOTE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWILLISTON DOWNTOWNERS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLISTON COMMUNITY BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds COYOTE CLAY TARGET LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAS FOR A CAUSE ↗
  • Who funds COYOTE WRESTLING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN LEGION DEPARTMENT OF NORTH DAKOTA ↗
  • Who funds WILLISTON PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Williston Basin Skating Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds UPPER MISSOURI VALLEY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HAGAN ELEMENTARY PTO ↗
  • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA AMERICAN LEGION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLISTON SEA LIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd ↗
  • Who funds WILLISTON COYOTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLISTON DOWNTOWNERS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Williston Convention and Visitors BureauND17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Williston Convention and Visitors Bureau · Williston State College Foundation · Ardean & Colleen Aafedt Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd?

    Find your warmest path to American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Legion 37 Edgar M Boyd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph