Skip to content
American Jobs and Security at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Jobs and Security

American Jobs and Security was formed to promote the idea of peace and prosperity through strong security policies.

$5.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Benefit$6.8MCommunity Improvement$1.8MCivil Rights$975kHealth$950kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kEmployment$10k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $625k
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.7M
$200,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$242k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Jobs and Growth$1,750,000
A Healthy Future$950,000
The Revitalization Project$760,000
Conserv Agenda for Americans$725,000
Keystone Renewal PAC$500,000
A Public Voice$200,000
Win it Back PAC$100,000
Economic Future Fund$100,000
Safe Streets Safe Comm$100,000
Polaris Action Inc$75,000
Riverswim Strategies$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%American Jobs and Growth: $1.8M → 10%Polaris Action Inc: $75k → 10%Keystone Renewal PAC: $500k → 11%Win it Back PAC: $100k → 14%A Healthy Future: $950k → 16%Conserv Agenda for Americans: $725k → 16%Prosperity Alliance: $1.0M → 6%American Exceptionalism: $2.5M → 7%American Policy Coalition: $1.5M → 9%Safe Streets Safe Comm: $100k → 14%Riverswim Strategies: $50k → 16%A Public Voice: $200k → 6%The Revitalization Project: $760k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Advancement

Promote public policies aimed at removing barriers to economic growth and advancing economic opportunity for the American people.

—
2
American Jobs and Security

American Jobs and Security was formed to promote the idea of peace and prosperity through strong security policies.

—
3
Government Integrity Fund

To Conduct research and educate the public about various policy issues across the United States.

—
4
Defend Us Inc

The organization works to defend, protect, and advance bedrock American values.

—
5
United for Clean Power

United for Clean Power is focused on public policies that build a 21st century energy future.

Environment
6
American Prosperity Alliance

American Prosperity Alliances mission is to advocate for legislative and regulatory policies that advance economic prosperity in America.

—
7
Jobs and Progress Fund Inc

To promote the common good and general welfare through education and legislative participation on public matters that significantly impact the economy, job growth and retention, employment and that are designed to promote fiscal…

—
8
Independence and Freedom Network

Independence and Freedom Network was founded to promote solutions to pressing public policy problems related to individual liberty and the expansion of personal freedom.

—
9
21st Century Policy Institute

21st Century Policy Institute engages in public policy advocacy including advocacy to sustain a dialog around the critical importance of Americas economic and military strength and the related implications both domestically and abroad.

—
10
Citizens for a Working America Inc

To promote sound economic policy: 1 By engaging in citizen led initiative and referendum efforts, 2 By participating in the public policy arena, and 3 By providing educational services to the general public.

—
11
Policy Action for a Clean Tomorrow Inc

Clean Tomorrow advances policies that reduce climate emissions by turning policy ambition into action. We work to catalyze rapid change that will accelerate the innovation and growth of clean energy.

Environment
12
American Governance Foundation Inc

To study and promote positive reform of American public institutions. To this end we undertake public interest research journalism and public media especially via Palladium Magazine convene meetings workshops and community events.

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Policy Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Polaris Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
0/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Jobs and Growth Fund: $1,750,000 · OtherAmerican Jobs and Growth FundA Healthy Future: $950,000 · OtherA Healthy FutureConservative Agenda for America: $725,000 · OtherConservative Agenda for AmericaKeystone Renewal PAC: $500,000 · OtherKeystone Renewal PACSafe Streets Safe Communities: $350,000 · OtherSafe Streets Safe Communities+4 more: $285,000 · Other+4 moreAmerican Exceptionalism Institute: $2,500,000 · Community ImprovementAmerican Exceptionalism InstituteThe Revitalization Project: $760,000 · Community ImprovementThe Revitalization ProjectAmerican Policy Coalition: $1,500,000 · Public BenefitAmerican Policy CoalitionProsperity Alliance Inc: $1,000,000 · Public BenefitProsperity Alliance IncA PUBLIC VOICE INC: $250,000 · Public BenefitA PUBLIC VOICE INC
Other$4,560,000Community Improvement$3,260,000Public Benefit$2,750,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Exceptionalism Institute: $2,500,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetAmerican Jobs and Growth Fund: $1,750,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetAmerican Policy Coalition: $1,500,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetProsperity Alliance Inc: $1,000,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetThe Revitalization Project: $760,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetConservative Agenda for America: $725,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSafe Streets Safe Communities: $350,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetA PUBLIC VOICE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetEconomic Future Fund: $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetPOLARIS ACTION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American AdvancementThe Revitalization Pr…Prosperity Alliance I…A Public Voice IncGovernment Integrity …American Policy Coali…Citizens for a Workin…
American AdvancementMD24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Advancement · The Revitalization Project · Prosperity Alliance Inc · A Public Voice Inc · Government Integrity Fund · American Policy Coalition · Citizens for a Working America Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Jobs and Security funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Jobs and Security. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Jobs and Security’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home