Skip to content

· Public charity

American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc

Aime supports its member societies by exercising fiscal responsibility, distributing funds, and facilitating interaction with the relevant, (continued on sch 0)

$1.1M
Granted FY2021
4
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$352k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Science & Tech$2.1MEnvironment$27kCommunity Improvement$20k
02FY2021 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$257,772
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Society of Petroleum Engineers$352,387
Society for Mining Metallurgy & Exploration$257,772
ASSN IRON AND STEEL TECHNOLOGY$256,254
The Minerals Metals and Materials Society$255,557
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Minerals Metals and Materials Society: $256k → 11%Society of Petroleum Engineers: $352k → 14%Society for Mining Metallurgy & Exploration: $258k → 8%The Minerals Metals and Materials Society: $88k → 11%SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS: $156k → 14%SOCIETY FOR MINING METALLURGY AND EXPLORATION: $156k → 8%ASSN IRON AND STEEL TECHNOLOGY: $256k → 11%Society of Petroleum Engineers: $103k → 14%Society for Mining Metallurgy & Exploration: $88k → 8%ASSN IRON AND STEEL TECHNOLOGY: $156k → 11%MINERALS METALS AND MATERIALS SOCIETY: $156k → 11%ASSN IRON AND STEEL TECHNOLOGY: $88k → 11%ASSN IRON AND STEEL TECHNOLOGY: $27k → 11%ASSN IRON AND STEEL TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS INC: $610,461 · Science & TechSOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS INCSOCIETY FOR MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION (SME): $500,846 · Science & TechSOCIETY FOR MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION (SME)THE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY INC: $498,631 · Science & TechTHE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY INCAssociation for Iron and Steel Technology: $546,325 · Community ImprovementAssociation for Iron and Ste…
Science & Tech$1,609,938Community Improvement$546,325

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS INC: $610,461 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAssociation for Iron and Steel Technology: $546,325 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR MINING METALLURGY & EXPLORATION (SME): $500,846 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE MINERALS METALS & MATERIALS SOCIETY INC: $498,631 over 3y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers IncCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Institute of Mining Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph