Skip to content
American Indigenous Tourism Association Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Indigenous Tourism Association Inc

Define, introduce, grow and sustain american indigenous tourism that honors traditions and values.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$1.2MRecreation & Sports$560kCommunity Improvement$317kEnvironment$124kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $818k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$226,240
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WRANGELL COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION$250,000
SHOSHONE-PALUTE TRIBES OF DUCK VALL$249,562
CHUGACH REGIONAL RESOURCES$226,240
CAPE FOX CULTURAL FOUNDATION$187,462
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION$100,000
CENTRAL COUNCIL TINGIT & HAIDA$54,751
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHONTO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $16k → 26%CHIEF JOSEPH FOUNDATION: $217k → 11%LA JOLLA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS: $250k → 11%PIT RIVER KWAHN CORP: $158k → 13%NATIVE HAWAIIAN HOSPITALITY ASSOC: $50k → 9%AKWASESASNE TRAVEL ST REGIS: $50k → 16%JEMEZ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $129k → 10%PUEBLO OF PICURIS: $250k → 18%UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE: $83k → 19%CATAWBA INDIAN NATION: $100k → 8%US FOREST SERVICE: $124k → 14%BAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY: $116k → 13%SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE: $225k → 9%JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE: $147k → 12%CONF TRIBES OF COLVILLE: $136k → 17%ALUTIIQ MUSEUM & ARCHAEOLOGICAL: $129k → 8%CAPE FOX CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $187k → 9%ALASKA NATIVE HERITAGE CENTER: $50k → 10%WRANGELL COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION: $250k → 12%METLAKATLA INDIAN COMMUNITY TOURISM: $50k → 15%PINE RIDGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $50k → 42%SHOSHONE-PALUTE TRIBES OF DUCK VALL: $250k → 10%CHUGACH REGIONAL RESOURCES: $226k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MI
NY
SD
CA
AZ
NM
DC
HI
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
0/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WRANGELL COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION: $250,000 · OtherWRANGELL COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONPUEBLO OF PICURIS: $250,000 · OtherPUEBLO OF PICURISLA JOLLA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS: $250,000 · OtherLA JOLLA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANSFallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe: $249,562 · OtherFallon Paiute-Shoshone TribeChugach Regional Resources Commission: $226,240 · OtherChugach Regional Resources CommissionSNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE: $225,000 · OtherSNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBEPIT RIVER KWAHN CORP: $157,500 · OtherPIT RIVER KWAHN CORPJAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE: $147,000 · OtherJAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBECONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION: $136,314 · OtherORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KASAAN: $135,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $129,000 · OtherUS FOREST SERVICE: $123,949 · OtherBAY MILLS INDIAN COMMUNITY: $116,100 · OtherCATAWBA INDIAN NATION: $100,000 · Other+5 more: $253,751 · Other+5 moreCape Fox Cultural Foundation: $187,462 · Arts & CultureCape Fox Cult…ALUTIIQ HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $129,114 · Arts & CultureALUTIIQ HERIT…Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureAlaska Native…NATIVE HAWAIIAN HOSPITALITY ASSOC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE HAWAII…Chief Joseph Foundation: $216,508 · AnimalsPINE RIDGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $50,000 · Education
Other$2,749,416Arts & Culture$416,576Animals$216,508Education$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChugach Regional Resources Commission: $226,240 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetChief Joseph Foundation: $216,508 over 1y, 63% of budgetALUTIIQ HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $129,114 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAlaska Native Heritage Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIVE HAWAIIAN HOSPITALITY ASSOC: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chugach Regional Resources Commission ↗
  • Who funds Chief Joseph Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Cape Fox Cultural Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALUTIIQ HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds PINE RIDGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE HAWAIIAN HOSPITALITY ASSOC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Develop…Grid Alternatives
First Nations Development InstituteCO21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · Grid Alternatives

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Indigenous Tourism Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Indigenous Tourism Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to American Indigenous Tourism Association Inc?

    Find your warmest path to American Indigenous Tourism Association Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on American Indigenous Tourism Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home